• katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    wow who could have predicted this considering they’re the same companies who said they wouldn’t donate to republicans after january 6th three months before they started donating to republicans again.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My favorite lemmy bubble is the smug woke ( idiot leftists, who think they are smart but aren’t) who think Kamala lost because she didn’t take a stance on Gaza and people abstained in protest and not because of sexism and racism.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That would be REALLY Corrupt if simply buying Ads on a Website was Enough to allow you to DIRECTLY INFLUENCE the President Of The United States! Fortunately Trump DIDNT put the Owner of X in charge of Important Oversight Decisions!

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      When Hitler needed to track the unwanted in his concentration camps, IBM was there.

      Today, Trump has selected IBM due to our experience in this field of Fascism.

      FYI: while this is not true, I’m sure most Americans will believe it.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Still, “under $2,000” for a corporation of that size is a surprisingly low amount, compared to the others. Not even worth the negative publicity. Odd choice.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Ah, a history joke! Don’t forget Coke(Fanta)! Also, the history of Volkswagon is pretty interesting.

      The surprising part is, despite everything Henry Ford believed, I don’t remember ever hearing Ford being on that list.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I get the first one…no idea what the second references. It sounds like if something from transformers were crossed with the matrix, and handled by santa claus.

          Which if that existed sounds kind of terrifying.

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    182
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “X’s owner now has the ear of the president-elect, a man who has a long history of helping his friends, and punishing his enemies,” said Max Willens, senior analyst, at Emarketer. “Sending at least a trickle of ad spending toward X may be seen as good for business, albeit in an indirect way.”

    There’s the article in a nutshell. Give Elmo money or face the wrath of the Diaper-in-Chief.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And nobody was surprised. I predict most advertisers will return by the end of January for the same reasons they left previously: It’s the right business decision at the right time. Remember that the next time a corporation makes a pledge. It’s always about money.

  • Tehhund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Did anyone read the article? Besides the top 2, these amounts are paltry:

    Data by MediaRadar showed that Comcast, which spent less than $1.5 million on X this year, was followed by Warner Bros. Discovery at $1.1 million, whose ads are supporting theatrical releases of movies, and Disney at under $550,000. Lionsgate spent less than $230,000, while IBM allocated under $2,000.

    That’s embarrassing.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    When have Comcast, Disney, or IBM ever have been on the wrong side of history? /s