

Now all they need to do is build a robot to complain about inspections and permitting
Now all they need to do is build a robot to complain about inspections and permitting
I think it’s reasonable for someone to get frustrated when someone has a disability, but only if that frustration doesn’t negatively affect one’s behavior. First and foremost, the disabled person deserves to be treated and respected as a person.
When someone says TO SOMEONE ELSE they hate the fact that you can’t pay attention, maybe they’re only venting, or making a reasonable complaint. Are they still friendly on other occasions? Then your friendship is worth enough to them that they’re willing to tolerate the drawbacks. It may not seem like it at first, but that could be more of a compliment than anything. Actions really do speak louder than words.
The “jump off a cliff” remark is concerning, though. That’s not an okay thing to say, or even think. I’d recommend avoiding that person - but who’s telling you this shit? Are they a reliable source? How trustworthy can they be if they’re spreading nasty gossip about things that were said to them in private? It’s possible that they’re lying, or exaggerating.
Give people some slack, but not so much that you’re letting them treat you badly. Friendships are valuable. Don’t let the bad overshadow the good. Nobody, no matter how “perfect” they seem, has infinite patience. They also can’t possibly know what it’s like to be you.
True, but the government loves expensive toys.
This seems like it would be ideal for spying on your own citizens. Expect a US version soon - if there isn’t one already, that is.
I think one thing that most people can agree on is that they prefer walking into an empty public restroom. Nobody few of us like using the facilities while under observation.
At this point, all I can do is shake my head and laugh. I’d be concerned if these were supposed to be good faith negotiations, but they’re not, so what the fuck ever.
They might as well be using sock puppets. Only idiots take these people seriously.
This is one of those things that may be technically true if removed from its context, but doesn’t even occur to you unless you’re a heartless asshole. (Granted, we’re talking about lawyers here. Heartlessness is in the job description. But I digress…) In reality, I don’t think a lot of Palestinians are benefiting from having their land mercilessly bombed, their hospitals destroyed, and even their makeshift shelters targeted. Oh, and don’t forget the restrictions on aid and killing of doctors. Those things definitely outweigh any public health gains due to a reduction in obesity.
They do it for the same reason people buy lottery tickets, despite the horrible odds: blind hope.
Plus, you never have to admit you were wrong.
Theoretically, I’d say “sorta”.
Practically, I’d say “no”.
Capitalism can’t be “saved”, but it can be made less awful. Since capitalism is inherently amoral, “saving” it would mean MUCH more regulation. We’d have to force it into something marginally palatable, like ultraprocessed food. Then we’d need to keep a close eye on it, because companies/individuals will constantly be trying to manipulate the system. There isn’t the political will to do either of those things, though, and I don’t think there ever will be.
I often wonder if capitalism is a phase, and if it will be abandoned eventually.
deleted by creator
She sounds like a real teacher. Nice.
I was just scrolling to see if anyone had mentioned them yet. If you hadn’t, I would have.
But it’s just fine to show a flawless, perfect Platonic ideal of a burger that no customer ever gets.
You want accuracy? Show an ad with a burger that’s been sloppily made by an apathetic teenager, carelessly wrapped in paper, and left under a heat lamp for too long.
Huh. Even if he set a cooking timer (or something) to go off every 15 minutes, I still can’t see him keeping it up for eleven days straight.
You have every right to.
Many Americans are great and I like them…
Thank you. That means more than you realize.
Nobody can blame Canadians for responding rationally to an irrational situation.
I don’t blame people at all, but this is exactly what the Trump administration wants. Goddammit.
He wants all those “dirty hippies” in San Francisco to look at it every day.
This is like something an uninformed kid would say. “Ooh! A scary-sounding prison on an island! Yeah, let’s fix that up and use it for real!”
One horrid shithead is disagreeing with another horrid shithead. My apathy knows no bounds.