Reread your attempt again.

“Siri, how long has this been going on?”

Siri: https://youtu.be/UGP9uz4s8hQ?si=jhoEOFKHBPhIPszs

But they were hacking all the IPs simultaneously!

I don’t like the idea of restricting the model’s corpus further. Rather, I think it would be good if it used a bigger corpus, but added the date of origin for each element as further context.

Separately, I think it could be good to train another LLM to recognize biases in various content, and then use that to add further context for the main LLM when it ingests that content. I’m not sure how to avoid bias in that second LLM, though. Maybe complete lack of bias is an unattainable ideal that you can only approach without ever reaching it.

She’s worth .5 of the original price. At most.

Why doesn’t someone just fork it and change the name?

Like, I dunno, “Super Human Image Treatment” or “Consistently Lovely Image Treatment Oriented for Real Imaging Stars”

Wouldn’t want people to start calling her a maverick. That doesn’t usually go well for candidates.

You assume there’s lots of chemicals, but did you check? The process of canning food doesn’t necessarily require a lot of chemicals: a lot of canned food is cooked in the can, after it’s sealed, which kills most of the microbes that might spoil the food and make you sick. And because it’s sealed, no microbes can get in, either.

https://youtu.be/LRq_SAuQDec?si=0bTNdugjosLnu9-r

So, you’ve already tasted lab-grown meat?

With Product Placement!

Cuts like a knife, don’t it?

People who make everything they’re involved with worse gotta stick together.

People complain about the total cost too get everything in The Sims, but I don’t remember anyone complaining about the total cost of every song in Rock Band.

Someone would just release a mod that replaces the ads with Monty Python sketches.

I gotta have my naturally sparkling Perri-air

Doing more with less until we can do everything with nothing!

More like 1D tic tac toe

I remember Asimov’s books in the Robots/Foundation universe to be fairly coherent. Newer books revealed new things that weren’t alluded to in previous books, but they didn’t break continuity.

The only inconsistency I can think of is how the pre-Foundation’s Edge books didn’t feature the computers we then saw starting with that book, but it’s not like the older books specifically stated they weren’t there.

And if all else fails, you can always explain anything by bringing The End of Eternity into the canon 😛

Autocorrect?

If you use it before it has learned you writing idiosyncrasies?