It turned out really well in NZ when we legalised it.
There’s even a sex workers union.
We still have our share of christofacists and prosperity grifters though, they’re just relatively politically impotent.
It turned out really well in NZ when we legalised it.
There’s even a sex workers union.
We still have our share of christofacists and prosperity grifters though, they’re just relatively politically impotent.
Anxiety?
If that tiny idiot of an amygdala in your brain thinks you’re in danger then nausea can be a symptom.
Too bad that that’s not in the interest of ol’ papa USA.
The Cuban people can keep suffering because of idealistic arrogance from their big fat capitalist neighbour.
I have X years experience with {keyword salad}.
Can you confirm {details already in the opening post}?
Rattle that sabre harder.
February isn’t in summer.
Yeah, it is.
Someone left their pager in the mine and just fetched it again. Delayed message delivered.
/S
Occam’s razor indeed. Coal mines explode. Or rather, only just barely don’t explode all the time.
Now I’m torn between:
A) riot cops ignore kid
B) riot cops fire 40mm “non-leathal” whatever at kid, killing them instantly
I still double-check my CIDR’s/netmasks and expected ranges with a tool (some online one or other). Easier to avoid silly mistakes or typo’s
TL;DR: it depends entirely on the DHCP server software.
Generally the safe/reliable policy is to assign a smaller DHCP range (or ranges) and allocate static assignments outside of the DHCP range(s).
Assume your network is 192.168.1.0/24.
Specify 192.168.1.128/25 for DHCP, which means all DHCP addresses will be above 192.168.1.128.
This leaves you everything below 192.168.1.127 for static assignments.
Yeah, I agree that it’s unfair that it underrepresents childless people, and over represents large families.
What annoys me is that a very large portion of the population is disenfranchised (but still taxed in my country). Children have the most to lose, they’re voting with an 80-year view, the oldies are voting with a 5 year view.
As opposed to billionaires just buying politicians?
Parents somehow “taking advantage” isn’t the problem.
It’s not like someone can just pop out 100 children to skew votes.
Literally anything you find interesting.
Learning begets learning. The more you learn the easier learning becomes.
So start learning things that are interesting… then worry about things tha are “valuable”.
Parents should be allowed a vote on behalf of their children until their children reach whatever age the jurisdiction allows independent voting.
The most vitriolic responses were from fathers who don’t want to admit they mutilated their sons.
Circumcision is genital mutilation.
I think Hilary Clinton said it:
The worst man is still favoured over the best woman.
It’s something like that.
Urgh. Now I see an auto-corrected error.
Mediocre