Use a user agent spoof extension on Firefox, should trick the website into thinking it’s running chrome.
It is not out of the question that I may have a very minor case of serious brain damage
Use a user agent spoof extension on Firefox, should trick the website into thinking it’s running chrome.
deleted by creator
I switched 2 weeks ago, 12% of my years playtime is on Linux now. Should I be concerned about how active I am?
Advertisers, please do this to YouTube too. I need the dislike count back.
If you want people to disable content blockers on your website, it’s best not to treat the people who don’t have one on like shit YouTube.
Good to know it works well with Arch, since I’m going to be using Manjaro, which is Arch-based.
Not sure why the Linux community is convinced macOS is better than Windows. macOS has the same big issues Windows has (Spyware, ads, and the inability to delete the built in browser) while having worse issues like not supporting openGL/Vulkan, not allowing the user to install old apps, the inability to install hardware, and the small issue of only a select few Linux distros that work with it. Windows isn’t good, but it’s still better than macOS in most regards.
Under Article 5(3) of 2002/58/EC YouTube are legally obligated to obtain consent before storing or accessing information already stored on an end user’s terminal equipment unless it is strictly necessary for the provisions of the requested service.
In 2016 the EU Commission confirmed in writing that adblock detection requires consent.
The EU stepped in, they have to remove it in Europe. Not sure about America though…
They’re begging for a direct competitor.
A paid adblocker/ video downloader is worth 20$ a month for 5 people? Every feature in premium has a third party tool alternative you could easily use anyway.
They had a system in place that put more ads on users depending on how many used an ad blocker. When the users got used to it, YouTube realized they could push it on everyone and make more money. They’d survive as a business even if that wasn’t the case anyway, Google owns them.
How exactly is this a shower thought? (I agree by the way, but how?)
No long form video content platform better than YT yet, I’ll be switching as soon as someone can make something better.
Why shouldn’t Microsoft be held accountable for everything illegal people do on Windows? Why shouldn’t pharmacists be held responsible for prescription drug abuse? Why shouldn’t a social media website be held accountable for users infringing copyright? If something is used illegally and the person who made it is held accountable, that doesn’t really make sense even if you dislike the thing. For example, I hate YouTube, but it doesn’t make sense for them to be held accountable for users posting copyright infringing content.
That depends on:
You can get both INSIDE and LIMBO for around $2.70 in a bundle as well if you want to get both, I bought it yesterday. https://store.steampowered.com/bundle/1837/INSIDE__LIMBO/
It’s as simple as this: -Politician does something illegal -Politician is caught -Politician tells their party members they didn’t do -Party members believe politician because they’re of the same party -Politician now has millions of supporters vouching for them not to get convicted -Politician doesn’t get convicted
It’s happened before, it’s happening now, it’ll happen again.
Geometry Dash