Yes, because it’s okay to punch Nazis
🩷💜💙
Yes, because it’s okay to punch Nazis
Could it be 3 different days ? Because I don’t want to spend one day per week staring at my walls
You’re right. The rules are not the same with your own cats. One of my cats likes long blinks (aka “eye kisses”), and for an other one it’s a call to play and cuddle on the rug.
Also, avoid direct eye contact, and never ever stare into their eyes. This is the equivalent of an oath of blood and despair.
That’s something people who don’t own a cat don’t understand: the less you look at them, the more friendly they think you are (that’s why cats love allergic persons)
Firstly, the more students there are, the less time the teacher can devote to them individually. When there’s a comprehension problem, it’s really in the interaction that things can be sorted out: understanding why the person doesn’t understand, explaining from different angles, etc.
And all the time spent with one person leaves the rest of the group on its own, which can very quickly dissipate all the group’s attention, with a few whispered personal discussions turning into hubbub.
What’s more, the larger the group, the easier and more tempting it is for weak and shy students to hide in the crowd. In a small group, the teacher should regularly check that no one is left behind. With 100 people, this is strictly impossible.
Finally, I don’t believe in the argument that the more people you have, the more friends and studying partners you can find. Socially, we get together in small groups (between 2 and 6, roughly speaking) no matter what’s going on. I think that beyond this limit, there’s a diminishing return (unconsciously): a new person brings less than reinforcing the group’s cohesion. If the group gets any bigger, it’s going to reshape itself by affinity into smaller, tighter-knit groups.
Rating: I don’t believe in rating system. If I say 3/10, can you change 20% of your idea to reach 5/10? What’s 20% of an idea ? Would 5/10 be good enough? Can you change 70% of an idea to reach perfection? In this case, why don’t we live in a perfect world?
When he was young, he had an atypical beauty but he was fucking hot.
It makes a very positive difference, according to their lawyers.
Beyond the legal aspect, AI training on artists’ works poses an ethical problem. And when it comes to ethics, I think we can avoid quoting Picasso,
Oh yeah, Picasso. The great artist who was an abusive guy who beat her mistress to paint her crying (The Weeping Woman / Dora Maar).
And rear parking sensors. I don’t want a fancy camera+screen system, but simply an ultrasonic sensor which beeps if you’re going to hit something
It’s foodporn.
(Tbh, my NSFW account eventually became my main account)
Maybe smash isn’t the right word (I’m not a native English speaker).
You put the cucumber on a cutting board, lay a large knife flat on it and strike the flat of the blade with the underside of your fist.
The TikTok trend is roughly as follows:
Oh no !It’s summer ! People are eating cucumbers (with soy sauce) and (frozen) tomatoes! Something broke the supply chain !
Ban the bully from the school where they harassed kids. It should always be like that.
I think it’s even older than that. I remember a scene in Fight Club (1999) in which the main character gives a motivational speech “You are not special. You’re not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You’re the same decaying organic matter as everything else.”
Have you checked your =B=?
I’m a vegetarian, and the answer is no. I find the idea of vat-grown meat disgusting, like something out of a bio-mechanical nightmare.
It wouldn’t be a problem. I’m bi, and when I’m in love, it’s not a question of gender expression or body.
You’re right, belonging to a country that’s committing genocide shouldn’t stop you having fun.
As a Frenchman, I’m proud to know that we organized concerts and plays in Paris in the 40s to entertain the poor Nazi soldiers who had seen so many horrors.