As if it takes Russia to get the US bogged down in the middle east…
As if it takes Russia to get the US bogged down in the middle east…
That last line was waiting around the corner with a 2x4
“It’s not piracy, it’s federated backups!”
And they do. My Philips TV didn’t even ask for DNS until hardcoded IPs for Netflix et al. timed out. And when it did, it asked Google, not my router.
Forgot to shuffle accounts around, I guess.
IDK, FRY was de facto kicked out of the UN in 1992.
Consider it backwards: Israel sees this attack happening so valuable, that they were willing to forego using the pagers for spying.
She’s stealing the planet’s cool! Stop her!
Yeah, only notification notification I ever see is when I send tabs from my PC.
I… get the feeling you’re not trying to have a conversation about the particular incident in the OP article. Which is fine, and good, but don’t overproject.
Simple, we wrrie down the information on how to read the discs!
Nah, blinking when done. It’s a call to action of sorts.
Oh, it’s not the concern that’s funny, if they had that selfawareness it would be admirable. Instead, you have people pat themselves on the back for how aware they are every time they encounter a validating piece of propaganda they, of course, fall for. Big “I know a messiah when I see one, I’ve followed quite a few!” energy.
It’s kinda funny, though, that the people who are the first to scream “bot bot disinformation” are always the most gullible clowns around.
I’d sooner guess “ban evader”.
Welcome to post-structuralism, enjoy the ennui. And the cognac.
I meant that the money donated isn’t that much, compared to the existing endowment. I think it was Adam Tooze’s argument, that IIRC Columbia could basically afford to lose most if not all donation streams and just fund itself from the stock market. And his interpretation as to why they reacted so violently is either fully ideological on behalf of the admin, or because Colombia is actually underperforming as asset management, a panicking reasserting of who runs the place, which is in a way also ideological.
It’s not unaware. It’s a policy that allows protest as an abstract idea, as long as nobody actually ever does it. It’s reminiscent of Zizeks visiting grandma joke.
From what I understand it’s not even that much money. The logic seems to be that the idea of democratic money management must be stomped out regardless of the cause it’s advocated for.
And yet, somehow, this doesn’t stop surveillance bills?