• EatYouWell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 个月前

    I’m big on words having meaning and not using words with specific meanings incorrectly.

    • scarabic@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 个月前

      Apparently you’ve also never heard of similes or learned anything through comparisons. Enjoy your robotic application of strict denotations to the objects in your world.

      • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 个月前

        You can compare anything with a simile if you abstract it far enough. It doesn’t make it an accurate statement, though. I’m sure you could find similarities between Bambi and Hitler, but that doesn’t mean the two are interchangeable.

        Stockholm Syndrome and cultural indoctrination are two different things. Stockholm Syndrome is a defense mechanism.

        • scarabic@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 个月前

          Oh my god you actually included one explanatory sentence there at the end. Imagine if you built an entire argument.

            • scarabic@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 个月前

              I hope it’s also all right to admit when I’m bored, because I think I’ve already given you far too many opportunities to press that “no, I’m correct” button you seem to enjoy so much.

              • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 个月前

                Scarabic I know it means nothing in this digital space but I’m siding with you. Eatyouwell admitted himself that you can make anything a simile if you abstract it far enough… and that’s what you did. It was a stretch of cognition but that doesn’t make it “wrong” it just means it’s not simple and easy like eatyouwell is claiming makes him correct

                • scarabic@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 个月前

                  Thank you. I’m surprised by the amount of literalist nitpicking here. It’s as if I said “we’re all leaves on the wind” and people responded “ackshully that is not accurate as I am not in fact a leaf nor any part of a tree.”

                  I think the other part of it is that my simile may have been even more correct than I realized. People in this thread are avidly defending the fact that they’re not brainwashed. “No, me, never! I just really truly live my chosen values! Really really!”

                  Which sounds exactly like a Stockholm syndrome victim passionately declaring no, they aren’t brainwashed, they truly do side with their captor.

                  • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 个月前

                    We’re probably a lot like animals born in captivity. You don’t know what you’re missing but at the same time there are benefits and the benefits of being in captivity are all you know. So you defend your captors like a dog defending its owner because they look after you in many ways. But there’s a whole world out there that you have never known that could have been yours, for better or for worse. Sounds a lot like capitalism or many other forms of government for that matter.

                    Edit: hold on forget that, I drew parallels to make a simile which makes my opinion invalid