• UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is Steam really a monopoly when Valve doesn’t try to stifle competition and no other company could be bothered (besides maybe GOG) to make a half decent store?

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One aspect through which one could argue that they might stifle competition is their price parity rule, for which it seems they are being sued. See here (not sure if there is any new development.

      Hard to compete with steam if you cant at least do it through lower pricing. Although this article suggests that at least for epic exclusives publisher seem to prefer to just pocket the difference, rather than pass on those savings.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that just saying you can’t sell access to a game on steam (through a steam key) for a lower price than what’s on Steam? It’s not like they can’t just offer a lower price… just that they can’t offer it for a lower price bundled with Steam access.

        So they can offer a lower price, just not as a third party through Steam itself.

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are a monopoly because they…provide the best most fair platform. Also why would linux users support ubisoft or epic.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And yet they charge the same amount…

          Seems they use that as a way to get developers to join them, then guilt consumers into using their less useful platform.