By Alice Cuddy BBC News, Jerusalem


The call to Mahmoud Shaheen came at dawn.

It was Thursday 19 October at about 06:30, and Israel had been bombing Gaza for 12 days straight.

He’d been in his third-floor, three-bedroom flat in al-Zahra, a middle-class area in the north of the Gaza Strip. Until now, it had been largely untouched by air strikes.

He’d heard a rising clamour outside. People were screaming. “You need to escape,” somebody in the street shouted, “because they will bomb the towers”.

  • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is true that the actions of the military kill innocents. I think it would’ve happened even without Hamas using them as human shields.

    But should Israel simply stand idle as it’s citizens are slaughtered and kidnapped? If so, then why?

    That’s a false dichotomy, and one alternative approach was already provided in the comment you originally replied to.

    the Israeli State holds a humongous power advantage. They don’t use that power disparity to deescalate and integrate the Palestinian people to prevent Hamas from having support. Instead they do shit like this where they drive Palestinians straight into Hamas’ hands, because the Palestinian people are given no other option to turn to.

    Certainly there are even more alternatives that exist in the miles wide gap between “raze all of gaza” and “stand idle”.

    • kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Certainly there are even more alternatives that exist in the miles wide gap between “raze all of gaza” and “stand idle”.

      First they should try to invest into defense, maybe some sort of air defense system to mitigate the almost daily rocket and missile launches.

    • dontcarebear @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do agree that any cycle of violence further radicalizes the Palestinians. It also marginalized the Israeli left since Yitzhak Rabin was murdered. Both sides keep pushing, like a pendulum, ever since the negotiations with Yasser Arafat failed due to the right of return.

      Are the Israelis solely to blame for this? Maybe. Does it provide a solution for the here and now? No.

      That’s a false dichotomy, and one alternative approach was already provided in the comment you originally replied to.

      The original comment says integration, that is a one state solution for the two people. That means that the right of return takes place. If that happens, Israel is no longer a Jewish state.

      How can you integrate with a political movement that just murdered and kidnapped people your people? Who vowed to destroy your nation in very colorful ways? How do you solve the here and now?

      I agree that Israel shares plenty of blame, primarily the government and the right wing. Ok. How does that neutralize the threat of Hamas now? How does that stop the rockets? How can the IDF pull back and not get another surprise attack in three weeks?

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How can the IDF pull back and not get another surprise attack in three weeks?

        Now that they have killed so many civilians, it’s gonna be tough. They aren’t making it better as they continue destroying homes, hospitals, and refugee camps though. The time to try treating them like humans was before the recent attack.

        Here’s what I can tell you for sure:

        • You don’t reduce the number of terrorists by making it crystal clear that you give zero shits about civilian deaths
        • Whatever actions would lead to a reduction in terrorism from Gaza are going to start with humanitarian outreach, not bombs
        • And let’s not forget those illegal settlements which are a constant provocation.
        • Whatever the correct actions look like - they are going to need to account for the fact that they’ve just created shitloads more ill will than even was there previously.

        Do my bullet points solve the problem? Hell no. But my (or your) inability to come up with a solution doesn’t mean there isn’t a better one than what they are currently doing, and doesn’t support the idea that their only other option is to do nothing. Neither of us (presumably) are world leaders with experience in this area. But when shit comes out of my sink faucets, I don’t need to be a plumber to know that mine has fucked up.

        • dontcarebear @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you on most of what you said here. Things are fucked. Better solutions should be sought, especially diplomatic ones - if possible. Until such a solution presents itself, stopping Israel sounds like a bad idea.