cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/5431344

The enshittification of the internet follows a predictable trajectory: first, platforms are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. It doesn’t have to be this way. Enshittification occurs when companies gobble each other up in an orgy of mergers and acquisitions, reducing the internet to “five giant websites filled with screenshots of text from the other four” (credit to Tom Eastman!), which lets them endlessly tweak their back-ends to continue to shift value from users and business-customers to themselves. The government gets in on the act by banning tweaking by users - reverse-engineering, scraping, bots and other user-side self-help measures - leaving users helpless before the march of enshittification. We don’t have to accept this! Disenshittifying the internet will require antitrust, limits on corporate tweaking - through privacy laws and other protections - and aggressive self-help measures from alternative app stores to ad blockers and beyond!

  • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    A good search engine would be nice to have (again). How come even duck duck go or other (free?) search engines are also so bad now?

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because operating a search engine is expensive. I personally use Kagi and love it, but that’s $10/month for unlimited searches.

      • pensa@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried the 100 free searches from Kagi and compared the results to DDG. In almost every search the results were the same. Even the order. I think the real benefit to Kagi is the lack of ads and tracking, tha’s all.

        I think the real reason search sucks these days is the AI they put between you and what your looking for. It’s no longer searching for what you typed, it’s searching for what it thinks you want.

      • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have tried it and seriously didn’t see any difference between it and Google or duck duck go…

        How come Duck duck go was close to Google when Google was really good, bug now both of them are serving just crap? Are we sites getting better at climbing the ladder?

        • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Kagi currently uses Google and Bing in addition to their own index to serve you search results. They’ll likely only use their own index once it’s complete enough to be a replacement, as the API costs they pay to Google and Bing are not sustainable even with paying customers.

          The advantage of Kagi being paid as opposed to being ad-supported is that you get unbiased results, or results with your own bias applied. You can set ratings for domains where you can set their priority in search results or even outright block them.

          You can also setup redirects with regular expressions, so you could redirect youtube.com to piped.video for example.

          And sure, you can emulate some of these features (like blocking sites from search results and redirects) using browser add-ons, but with Kagi this is integrated right into the search query, and as it’s all server-side it works on all your devices. It’s just very convenient.

          Search always used to be free so I get that people find it discomforting having to pay $10/month for it (there’s also a $5/month plan with 300 searches instead of unlimited), but $10/month for something I use dozens of times per day seems like a no-brainer to me.

      • centof@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        DuckduckGo is basically a frontend for bing with some privacy marketing added to it. It still sends microsoft trackers. They are all so bad because of enshittification.

        Google and bing are here.

        Abuse users to benefit business customers

        • steakmeout@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is not correct. I think what you maybe referring to is an older dig by Brave and brave redditors when they noticed DDG were allowing MS trackers in specific cases.

          DDG explained that it was difficult to resolve due to the way MS engages cross-site tracking but it has since been rectified.

          Also, research has proven this was not some shady deal between MS and DDG.

          https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-duckduckgo-gates-track-idUSL1N3792HE

          • centof@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is not correct. While you may be correct about DDG not sending tracking to MS currently they do have a history of doing that. That does not change the technical fact that DDG is a frontend for Bing with a privacy focus, therefore they are just as subject to enshittification as Bing because their results are Bing results with a different User interface. DDG may be better from a privacy perspective than Bing but they are still subject to enshittification.

              • centof@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I am not lying. You are nitpicking a piece of my argument and then surmising that the rest of my argument doesn’t hold. The details of if they are currently blocking tracking is largely irrelevant to my point. I agree with you but you are misdirecting my words into your own ideas.

                • steakmeout@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No that’s what you’re doing. I fucking posted evidence you’re wrong and you’re ignoring it.

                  • centof@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    In other words, I hear and agree with the facts of what your saying but disagree with the implied conclusion of the facts. I am now disengaging as it is clear you are acting emotionally to my rational argument.