sqgl@beehaw.org to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoMeta fined $101 million by Ireland for storing hundreds of millions of passwords in plaintexttherecord.mediaexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1209arrow-down12
arrow-up1207arrow-down1external-linkMeta fined $101 million by Ireland for storing hundreds of millions of passwords in plaintexttherecord.mediasqgl@beehaw.org to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareBearOfaTime@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down6·1 month ago“mistake” I call BS. The reviews I’ve gone through for trivial stuff would’ve exposed this. This was intentional.
minus-squareHiddenLayer555@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·1 month agoHanlon’s Razor revised: Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence, except where there is an established pattern of malice.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoYeah, cause trivial systems are a lot easier to parse and review. At a base level that’s nonsense logic.
minus-squareBearOfaTime@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoMy point being the extensiveness of a review process. The more important a system, the more people it impacts, etc, the more extensive the review process. Someone chose to ignore this risk. That’s intentional.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoYou quite frankly, don’t know what happened and if you’re confident it’s intentional, all that says is that you’re a grump who likes to complain.
minus-squaremoody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoA mistake doesn’t mean it’s an accident. A mistake means they made the wrong choice.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoNever assume malice when something can be explained by stupidity
“mistake”
I call BS. The reviews I’ve gone through for trivial stuff would’ve exposed this.
This was intentional.
Hanlon’s Razor revised: Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence, except where there is an established pattern of malice.
Yeah, cause trivial systems are a lot easier to parse and review. At a base level that’s nonsense logic.
My point being the extensiveness of a review process.
The more important a system, the more people it impacts, etc, the more extensive the review process.
Someone chose to ignore this risk. That’s intentional.
You quite frankly, don’t know what happened and if you’re confident it’s intentional, all that says is that you’re a grump who likes to complain.
A mistake doesn’t mean it’s an accident. A mistake means they made the wrong choice.
Never assume malice when something can be explained by stupidity