• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, cause trivial systems are a lot easier to parse and review. At a base level that’s nonsense logic.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      My point being the extensiveness of a review process.

      The more important a system, the more people it impacts, etc, the more extensive the review process.

      Someone chose to ignore this risk. That’s intentional.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You quite frankly, don’t know what happened and if you’re confident it’s intentional, all that says is that you’re a grump who likes to complain.