• Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    That “Adobe Stock” photo from the article is just some generic AI crap.

    The door is wide open for a stock photo business right now, I guess.

    • Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hop on Adobe stock right now and search for something. Half of the results will be AI-generated. There’s a search filter that can exclude them.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Isn’t that kinda what AI images should be used for? Meaningless stock images? Like, if the article was about a specific person, or an interesting activity or place, then yea that’s not for AI. But a generic article about “jobs” seems fine.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        No?

        People are paying for those pictures, either as a subscription or per-use basis. They’re paying a rate to reflects work; photographers, models, rights - all kinds of different costs up front. None of that exists with AI.

        It’s sort of like sitting down to a restaurant, ordering and paying, and then getting served food from your own home. Some horseshit Kraft mac and cheese and fish sticks.