• I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Isn’t that kinda what AI images should be used for? Meaningless stock images? Like, if the article was about a specific person, or an interesting activity or place, then yea that’s not for AI. But a generic article about “jobs” seems fine.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 days ago

      No?

      People are paying for those pictures, either as a subscription or per-use basis. They’re paying a rate to reflects work; photographers, models, rights - all kinds of different costs up front. None of that exists with AI.

      It’s sort of like sitting down to a restaurant, ordering and paying, and then getting served food from your own home. Some horseshit Kraft mac and cheese and fish sticks.