Stamau123@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month ago_____ Rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10
arrow-up17arrow-down1image_____ Rulelemmy.worldStamau123@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareRandelung@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThis feels like a word that would be both singular and plural. Like sheep. Two wug.
minus-squareRobaque@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 month agoOnly if the amount of wug is a prime number. This is because non-prime numers of wuggi are highly unstable and will split into separate prime factors of wug if there’s enough space (and in most atmospheric conditions).
This feels like a word that would be both singular and plural. Like sheep.
Two wug.
Only if the amount of wug is a prime number.
This is because non-prime numers of wuggi are highly unstable and will split into separate prime factors of wug if there’s enough space (and in most atmospheric conditions).