stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 7 months agoconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netimagemessage-square398fedilinkarrow-up11.73Karrow-down172
arrow-up11.66Karrow-down1imageconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netstabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 7 months agomessage-square398fedilink
minus-squareThe Snark Urge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·7 months agoThe surplus should be returned to the sun. It’s called investing in your future.
minus-squarefreebee@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·7 months agoAdding a tiny bit of energy to the sun so it will have burned-up in 4bln minus 5 years instead of in 4 bln years? Genius.
minus-squareThe Snark Urge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoThe joke is that it wouldn’t work. God damn it lmfao
minus-squarebane_killgrind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoYOU DON’T KNOW THAT WE’VE NEVER TRIED
minus-squareThe Snark Urge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoTHAT SPEEDS UP THE RATE OF FUEL CONSUMPTION negligibly
The surplus should be returned to the sun. It’s called investing in your future.
Adding a tiny bit of energy to the sun so it will have burned-up in 4bln minus 5 years instead of in 4 bln years? Genius.
The joke is that it wouldn’t work. God damn it lmfao
YOU DON’T KNOW THAT WE’VE NEVER TRIED
THAT SPEEDS UP THE RATE OF FUEL CONSUMPTION negligibly
Not with that attitude.