Now we are facing an unprecedented growth of AI as a whole. Do you think is time for FSF elaborate a new version of GPL to incorporate the new challenges of AI in software development to keep protecting users freedom?

      • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The FSF is a non-working organization which refuses to let go of its horrible founder. I hoped it would move on, it didn’t and refused to despite massive amounts of community backlash. I no longer believe they should have any role in representing the Free Software movement.

        • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really like Stallman, the man that made me think about the importance of free software. In my opinion he is essential for free software movement even with some “controversial” ideas. I like the way he defends his ideas, is something rare nowadays.

          • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, I think his ideas on free software are good generally but his behaviour and opinions on other topics are pretty fucking terrible. I don’t understand why people want to defend that part. The FSF can function without him and defend the ideas of Free Software.

            • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Indeed, his ideas are often very controversial, he is a old man with old habits and I think he has some deficiency in the way he communicates with people that are contrary to his ideas and this fact makes everything even worse. I don’t know what will be with FSF after him for good and bad.

            • jarfil@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t want to defend all of his ideas, but I do want to point out that he’s most definitely neurodivergent, while having been used as a tackle target on several fronts by the same people claiming to defend people like him.

              If you take a look at those “opinions” from a purely abstract and “internal musings” point of view, you realize that his main fault has been musing aloud while staying in the spotlight and repeating a PR stunt routine taken from an age when Bill Cosby was seen as a family role model.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The GPL is a license made by the FSF, not sure who else could make a new version other than them. Other entities make their own licenses, which might or not be compatible with the GPL.

      • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone can make a license and make it compatible with the GPL but yes, I forgot that the FSF doesn’t allow modifications of the GPL which is pretty fucking weird thinking more about it.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It makes sense, because it makes “GPL” act as a trademark and a guarantee that the license is what it’s supposed to be. And they get that without even paying for a trademark registration, which also makes it a brilliant abuse of copyright law (which, arguably, is what the whole license is about in the first place).