• xor@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    8 months ago

    every time i see a “leftist” talk about not voting for biden, and thus supporting trump…

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m sorry, it’s probably considered some sort of a smug European truism by now, but I have to say it. There is no left in the US two-party system. It’s right or center-right, that’s the choices you have, a giant douche or a turd sandwich.

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is it really center-right? I think it is more far right and facist extreme right. Atleast when observed from scandinavia

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is but you have to think of each party as having sub-parties within them. There aren’t external coalitions between parties but internal coalitions within the parties.

        So a guy like Bernie Sanders is left, though not technically a Democrat, he caucuses with the Democrats effectively creating a coalition. There are many members within the Democratic Party that are also left wing, and others that are center, and others that could be considered right wing.

        The Republicans are similar, but have an internal coalition with the far right MAGA faction. Which causes them a lot of problems.

        The primary system is effectively a run off system which is used to determine a final two candidates to vote for in the final election. This system is old and has some bizarre traditions and has vulnerabilities to there being a third party spoiling everything.

        Obviously it’s a crusty system that developed without planning, but the the Presidential election it’s not that dissimilar to France’s run-off system, just takes more time. And the legislatures having coalitions between people with different politics happens everywhere, it’s just happening within the parties and requires people to vote in primaries to get more representatives that have similar views to their own to make up a greater percentage of the coalition (which also happens everywhere).

        In fact having coalitions within a party gives people more information when voting. If I’m voting for one of a dozen parties I don’t have a say over how a coalition is formed after an election. Someone declaring which coalition they intend to be a part of before the electorate votes gives the electorate both a say as to which individual they want (via primaries) and which coalition they want (in the general election).

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        This isn’t true in a global sense, nor is it true in a practical sense. There is a left in America, but it is tiny and rarely successful. Most liberal democracies are to the right of American Democrats at the global level on most issues. Every country has drifted rightward over the past half century, so the US isn’t unique.

      • It can be both true that there is no true Left with any political power in the US - individual congressional delegates, maybe, but no coalition or party - and still recognize that there remain differences in the parties and differing outcomes from their governance.

        It’s not anything like the Southpark situation; leftists forget so easily what could - and has - been lost under conservative leadership, that would not have been lost if the person who won the popular vote in the past 6 elections. Women would still have protected body autonomy in all states - that loss was a direct consequence of the Trump administration.

    • regul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      8 months ago

      If Biden wanted my vote he could simply stop supporting genocide. Really quite a low bar for him to clear.

      There’s “holding your nose” and there’s voting for someone actively aiding a genocide.

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        134
        ·
        8 months ago

        there’s “administration aiding a genocide, but also doing so because they’re being lied to by israel, who also has a massive propaganda campaign to manipulate americans into supporting them…”

        versus

        Project 2025 and their plans of a fascist dictatorship right here, complete with a genocide of trans people and hispanics… and muslims… AND a continuation of supporting israel…
        oh and aiding russians commiting genocide in ukraine.

        bruh

        voting trump in won’t save palestine, and it’ll make it soo so much worse

            • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              8 months ago

              Not voting is letting trump have an easier time at victory

              The core of the GOP’s strategy for holding on to power is the disenfranchisement of voters who are opposed to them. Not voting (or voting third party) is self-disenfranchisement and doing the GOP’s work for them.

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              8 months ago

              i mean to vote for someone who won’t support the genocide, but i wouldn’t fault anyone for looking at all the candidates and deciding none of them deserve to have the office.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I was young once too

                  this is ad hominem. what i’m saying is true or false regardless of how old i am. also, you don’t know how old i am. and on the internet, no one knows you’re a dog: you could be 12 years old for all i know.

                  this statement is pure sophistry. it’s disgusting rhetoric, and you should be ashamed.

                  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    It’s not ad hominem. I’m not saying you’re wrong because this is your first election, I’m saying I can tell this is your first election because voting third party is incredibly naive. If this isn’t your first election, then you should know better.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Every single person who has a nonzero chance of being president next year supports Israel, so you should vote based on what the best possible outcome is.

                  i only vote for someone i want to have the office. you don’t get to tell my what i value or how i should express my values. you certainly don’t get to tell me how to vote.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Eventually you’ll figure out that the party that got 1% of the vote last time isn’t suddenly gonna sweep it with 51% this time.

                  no one proposed that

                  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    The. What is the goal? To get to the magical 5%?

                    How’d that work out for Nader in 2000 when he didn’t even get to 3%? Was it worth it, when nearly 100k people voted for him in Florida, and Gore lost to Bush by a margin of only 537 votes? Would the environmentalists who supported Nader be more appreciative of Bush’s outcome than they would have been if Gores?

                    Third parties are great. We absolutely need them. But they cannot and will not ever get a foothold starting at the top of the ballot. Yang really has the right idea in The Forward Party, starting down ballot before even contemplating higher office. It’s the only way another party will ever get any significant standing.

              • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Nobody running for president, ever, has deserved the office. I sincerely believe, as Douglas Adams so eloquently put, that “those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.”

                I can’t think of any point in recent history where the choice is of who is deserving for office. The choice is, and has always been, who is the least undeserving of office (or the spoiler candidate). This year, I think it’s pretty obvious who is least undeserving of office.

                The choice of who is deserving for office is reserved for everyone else further down the ballot.

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            8 months ago

            What happens in a FPTP system with only 2 viable parties when everyone doesn’t vote for the least maniacal of the two?

            Who do you think wins that bout?

        • endhits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Stop acting like Biden is just being lied to by Israel and is some helpless victim. He is absolutely responsible for his continued allowance of the genocide of Palestinians. Hold your politicians to a higher standard.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            He is responsible, though I don’t expect a different response from the majority of people in Washington. I hope regret about his continued complicity in genocide continues to weigh heavily on his shoulders.

            I believe only 2 points about Palestine in this election:

            1. Trump will be worse for Palestine than Biden.

            2. Biden is likelier to switch positions on Palestine than Trump.

            When I look at everything else Trump endangers on top of Palestine, it’s not even a decision.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          So the CIA, NSA, … are just a bunch of idiots that can’t have info on their own? Then why spend so much money on them?

      • jwelch55@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you really believe not voting for Biden deceases the likelihood of genocide in Gaza? Because the alternative seems so much worse in every way, both for Gaza and so many other massively important issues

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          You are on a different and better level. You are a Chad consequentialist. Managing probabilities, shooting for the best outcomes, minimizing losses. Setting up the group of ideologically aligned leaders for future success. Fighting off fascism for four more years against all odds.

          They are a weak feelings voter. Hopes Biden senpai will notice them and throwing a temper tantrum when he doesn’t. Talks about genocide, but doesn’t actually care if Trump will handle the genocide any differently than Biden. Wants everyone else to suffer because they are suffering. Hoping if Trump gets elected that someone else will do the hard work and fighting to fix everything. Is burned out on politics, but instead of not voting quietly, makes big posts about how not voting is actually a good and very smart idea because they can’t handle the fact that they need to rest.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            41
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            And instead, a genocide will still be on, and also more women will go to prison for seeking medical care, and also my LGBT friends will have their rights eroded even more, and also the new president will annoint more christofascist Godkings to the Supreme Court ensuring that any attempt to vote for an actual leftist in the future is impossible, and it’ll be fine, because at least you didn’t vote for the guy that wouldn’t have done all that extra awful shit

            A vote is not an endorsement, stop treating it like it is.

            • regul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 months ago

              Wow that all sounds awful. Biden should really try to win in order to prevent that.

              I suggest he make himself more appealing by being anti-genocide.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                27
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Yeah, he should, and if he doesn’t, you still have to vote for him anyway, because the alternative is necessarily worse.

                It absolutely sucks that Democrats are able to make zero effort and get votes based solely on the fact that they aren’t Republicans, but that’s the way it is. Vote in primaries, fight to make Republicans adopt better policies so that Democrats have to react, and vote blue in November, because the alternative is half the people in the community we’re arguing in going to fucking jail for being trans.

          • jwelch55@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not asking you to. I asked if you truly think things will be better when you don’t?

          • mashbooq@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            8 months ago

            cool bud, then you’ll get someone who’s pro genocide anyway. what a difference you made.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            8 months ago

            Biden isn’t pro genocide, at least there is no evidence to say that. The Biden administration has been against the ground invasion from the start.

            Biden has made some missteps in my opinion, but America pulling support for Israel was never a real option. Israel does require aid, but Netanyaho doesn’t care if that aid comes from the US, or from his buddy Putin. Israel realigning with Russia would put Palestine in an even worse position because it would threaten their support from Iran.

            Then, of course, there is the risk of a regional war breaking out of Iran takes the strained relationship between the US and Israel as an opportunity. That could easily pull other countries in and become WW3.

            Foreign policy is about more than just virtue signaling. It’s outcomes that matter, and what a lot of people are calling for will not get them the outcomes they are looking for.

            Not that I’m shaming anyone for pressuring Biden. The positive movement on aid shipments was very likely helped along by the protest votes in Michigan.

            • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              How would aligning with Russia would help Israel when the US locks every weapon they can lock?

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Israel does a lot of research and innovation for US technologies, including weapons. That would be of great value to Russia. I can’t speak as to what weapons the US can and can’t lock.

                All of this is in a kind of unrealistic realm, because US support for Israel isn’t going anywhere.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Note: I despise Trump.

          Maybe it does… But not in the way many think.

          Imagine Trump wins, starts doing the shit he is saying he will do and the outcome is a civil war. I think Israel would stop being something the US would think about. And then the genocide stops… At least in one direction. But given the bad blood there is now there…

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think Israel would stop being something the US would think about. And then the genocide stops…

            I don’t think Israel would stop doing what they’re doing just because support stops from the US. They still have a lot of support from Europe and their own resources besides. They’re a nuclear power, they have however much leverage they want.

            The US should cut ties to at least partially absolve itself of responsibility for the genocide, but Palestine is not going to be saved until some global power is willing to stand with Palestine against Israel.

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        8 months ago

        And I’m sure letting trump have an easier time getting elected will make things so much better.

        I would recommend talking to your local representatives about the current situation and how important it is to you and expressing how you may support other people running against them if they don’t support a ceasefire.

        Local elections are really important.

      • This is the stance I really don’t understand. You do know that if Trump wins, even the limp-wristed calls for constraint go away? That Trump will actively encourage and endorse the genocide? That things will get measurably worse for the Palestinians?

        I really do want to understand how people who hold this particular position think not voting for Biden will improve the lot of the Palestinians. Please, enlighten me.

        • regul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I won’t vote for someone who’s pro genocide. It’s pretty simple.

          People who aid and abet genocide don’t get my vote.

          Biden’s not changing course, so he clearly thinks he can win just with the votes of people who are okay voting for a pro-genocide candidate. That’s his call to make.

          • Sorry for the delayed response.

            This year, it’s a choice between a person who’s funding a genocide while applying (admittedly limited) political pressure to restrain Israel, and a person who’s publically stated that he supports the genocide and thinks it isn’t going fast enough, and who would increase funding to increase the speed of the genocide.

            By not voting for the former, you are implicitly endorsing the latter (saying, he’s just as hood as the former), and are culpable if he is elected - the definition of moral evil includes inaction. Sitting this one out because you like neither candidate is a moral evil, since one candidate is categorically worse (genocide-wise) than the other.

            • regul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Biden has agency here. He could very easily get my vote, but chooses not to. He’s making conscious decisions with expectations to how people will receive them. That leaves us with two possibilities, which I alluded to earlier:

              1. He cares more about genocide than winning the election.
              2. He thinks he can win without the anti-genocide vote.

              If it’s 1, I don’t want him as my president. If it’s 2, he’s not expecting my vote and nor shall he get it.

    • Fish [Indiana]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I live in a red state so it doesn’t make any difference who I vote for. I’m not voting for Biden because I don’t want to support the Democrats and my vote doesn’t matter anyway. If I lived in a state where it mattered then I would probably vote for Biden because he’s not Trump.

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        that’s totally fair…
        depending on how red it is, some states do flip, especially with redistricting…
        ive voted third party in a super blue state before… but against trump, i even swallowed my vomit and voted for hillary

        i have a trans child, and i don’t want them put into a concentration camp for sneezing in a school zone or whatever they’re cooking up in Project 2025…

      • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Please still vote though! At least rest of the way down the ballot. The more local the office the more weight your vote has. Plus there is legislation to vote on. Sorry if you were already planning to, this was also more for anyone who agreed with the sentiment and will stay home.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Agreed. Local candidates and referendum votes are often more directly impactful to local communities.

          Things like legalization of weed, protection of abortion rights, and ranked choice voting usually show up as referendum votes. And when it comes to how homelessness, police, financial aid, schools, etc. in your area are managed, that’s all local politics.

          • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Exactly!!! Locally they are trying to recall a school board member for basically being liberal. Mask mandates, covid policies, some sort of race related class or club… you know the real egregious stuff. That’s really where conservatives are more active too.