• regul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    Think about how often you hear about this vs how often you hear about Xinjiang.

    • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s almost as if people on here have more influence on American atrocities than Chinese ones.

      • regul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I was making the point in the opposite direction. American slave labor is rarely broached in media, yet my government tells me that China is not to be trusted because the west claims they’re using slave labor in Xinjiang.

        • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Ah sorry, I don’t ever read about Xinjiang anymore and have seen similar posts about American slave labor on lemmy a lot so I assumed you were referring to that

  • dan42O@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does anyone have the Costco proof. They must have been doing this on a Costco level, getting other prisoners from different regions.

      • dan42O@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ll try to ween off of Costco now. Thank you internet exposing all the things we are oblivious to.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Costco isn’t the problem, they are a symptom, and there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Whatever alternative you choose will either have similar practices or be owned by the same/similar people.

          The problem is capitalism, and specifically in this case also the white supremacy that supports it.

          Aim to ween yourself, and everyone around you, off those (this is not to imply you are a capitalist or white supremacist, but we all exist under those systems, and others, and there is no escaping their impact - you are either oppressed by them or benefit from others being oppressed by them even if not directly or even willingly). Combat the system, not its symptoms, that battle is futile, which is why those in charge want you to keep fighting it so much.

          • ranmagender@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            yeah exactly the point of my posting this isnt to say people should boycott but they are free to choose to do so but rather that this is a symptom of capitalism and i thought people might find this interesting. capitalism requires exploitation at almost every level to sustain itself. sharing this article around is a great first start, maybe contact representatives. im not american but ive consumed a lot of stuff from some of these brands that are more global, some im already avoiding because of their stance on palestine but boycott is only one tool in our arsenal. The root problem in this and so many things is capitalism

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, it’s a good share, and of course I’m not encouraging people to shop at these places, just pointing out that the alternative won’t be much better…
              I’m not American either, but as you say, the problem is global and local to each country (in different ways, sure, but even in the UK many prisons are now run for profit, so things might not be on the same scale, or as explicit as in the US, but there are similar problems in different variations everywhere you look) which is why representatives within the existing system aren’t going to get any significant change either. The whole system is designed to withstand “reform”, which is why it needs abolishing, and you can’t do that playing by the rules they set, you have to be willing to unlearn a lot and build networks of solidarity and mutual aid and resistance, create alternatives within the local and global community that they can’t profit from or control, then go after about 2000 people that are holding the rest of the world hostage, and end this shit.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Prison labor as a continuation of chattel slavery is seriously flawed. You may be arguing “prisons are worse than you think”, but you’re implying is that “slavery wasn’t all that bad”.

    Prisons aren’t profitable, they cost States and the Feds billions. It’s true that private companies profit from prisons, but the vast majority of that profit comes from the prisoners and their families (often coercively) buying products/services.

    White prisoners make up ~50% of the populations. Are you really going to argue that the Union’s victory introduced white slavery to the US?

    Prisoners have rights.

    Incarceration isn’t inherited.

    The prison system is awful, racist, exploitive, senseless and unjust. But equating it with chattel slavery minimizes the abominable cruelty of that institution and serves white supremacy.

    • MeepsTheBard@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d argue that ignoring that any forced, unpaid labor under threat of violence is slavery is worse than “minimizing chattel slavery,” full stop.

      This is unintentionally drinking the corporate prison Kool Aid at best, and actively sanitizing our prison’s cruel labor system at worst.

      Accurately calling prison labor slavery isn’t a knock on chattel slavery, it’s an acknowledgement that it’s changed. Say it’s not as bad all you want, but it’s still the same forces at work.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s just so much there. You dance around a ton of things and beg like three different questions. Why are 50 percent of prisoners minorities? What happens if you refuse to work? It may not be inherited at birth but is the system setup to capture successive generations of prisoners from the same families?

      What you typed is the bullshit prison labor corporations use to argue in bad faith and it doesn’t stand up to the slightest examination. Slavery is bad. Period.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        There was this one time I had to help a customer after I clocked out. You can read all about it in my memoir “Twelve minutes a slave”.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          A. You didn’t have to.

          B. What the fuck does that have to do with anything I said? Are you equating prison labor to volunteering a few minutes at your normal job?

      • Fleamo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why are 50 percent of prisoners minorities?

        Because the system is racist and bad and minorities are disproportionately imprisoned. Nobody here is arguing against that. They are just pointing out that if 50% of the “enslaved” are white, that is a different sort of thing than the race-specific enslavement of black people. Things can be not-literal-slavery while still being bad.

        What happens if you refuse to work?

        I assume you can’t refuse without a medical exception of some kind. These are imprisoned people, they also can’t leave. Not trying to excuse everything about prison labor but as a society we have decided the state has the capacity to remove rights from people as a punishment after due process has been afforded to them. We can argue that it’s not right or humane to force labor on an imprisoned population without saying it’s literally slavery. “It’s not literally slavery” is not a defense of the system.

        We’re not arguing “well prisoners can’t be sold to other prisons so that proves it’s not slavery” because that one difference doesn’t prove anything, just like one similarity doesn’t prove anything.

        It may not be inherited at birth but is the system setup to capture successive generations of prisoners from the same families?

        …no? Even if you include Capitalism and wealth inequality and racist policing as part of “the system” maybe members of the same family are disproportionately likely to be imprisoned because they are the same race and likely similar economic status, that isn’t because a parent was imprisoned. There’s nothing targeting children of imprisoned people. And even then, you’re trying to compare disproportionate odds to be imprisoned to literal 100% ownership of slaves’ children by slave masters? What are we talking about here?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Are you really going to make the argument that forced labor with beating and torture as punishment for not working isn’t slavery? Even the guy I responded to felt like they had to strawman chattel slavery in there.

          And again you admit the system is racist. But the presence of white people means it can’t be slavery somehow?

          And because we made it legal it’s not slavery somehow?

          And we absolutely target the children of prisoners. Do you know what the police call it when a teenager hangs out with their ex felon dad? A gang association. Do you know what an employer calls surveillance and repeated searches? Unemployable.

          There’s a hundred little things like that, including the school to prison pipeline, the zip code lottery, over policing, and more.

          Saying we don’t target the exact same families for legal slavery requires ignoring the evidence of your eyes.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      White prisoners make up ~50% of the populations. Are you really going to argue that the Union’s victory introduced white slavery to the US?

      Yes, that’s exactly what happened. The fact that white people make up 50% of the prison population while being 60% of the general population means that minorities are still getting hit harder than white people, but white people did get swept up in this.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lmfao nah, slavery of any kind is one of those moral absolutes that humanity accepts for good reason. There is NO case where it’s acceptable. Literally NONE. 🤦

    • Fleamo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s also time-bound for the length of the sentence. So like sure it’s slavery…temporarily, non-inherited, non-race-specific, as a punishment for a crime, at least sometimes paid.

      Which is just a lot of caveats.

      Similarly, having a job is just temporary, non-inherited, non-race-specific paid slavery where you get to pick your slave master. Sure you can make that argument but it’s not a very good one.

      A lot of stuff about the US prison system is really bad, including this part, it’s just not literally slavery, and it doesn’t have to be slavery to be really bad and need changing.