Profile Privacy Settings · Issue #4223 · LemmyNet/lemmy
github.com
Requirements Is this a feature request? For questions or discussions use https://lemmy.ml/c/lemmy_support Did you check to see if this issue already exists? Is this only a feature request? Do not p...

I’ve been grappling with a concern that I believe many of us share: the lack of privacy controls on Lemmy. As it stands, our profiles are public, and all our posts and comments are visible to anyone who cares to look. I don’t even care about privacy all that much, but this level of transparency feels to me akin to sharing my browser history with the world, a discomforting thought to say the least.

While the open nature of Lemmy can foster community and transparency, it also opens the door to potential misuse. Our post history can be scrutinized by creeps or stalkers, our opinions can be nitpicked based on past statements, and we can even become targets for mass downvoting. This lack of privacy control can deter users from actively participating in discussions and sharing their thoughts freely.

Even platforms like Twitter and Facebook, often criticized for their handling of user data, provide some level of access control. Users can choose who sees their timeline: friends/followers, the public or nobody. This flexibility allows users to control their online presence and decide who gets to see their content.

The current state of affairs on Lemmy forces us into a cycle of creating new accounts or deleting old posts to maintain some semblance of privacy. This is not only time-consuming but also detracts from the user experience. It’s high time we address this issue and discuss potential solutions.

One possible solution could be the introduction of profile privacy settings, similar to those found on other social media platforms. This would give users the flexibility to choose their level of privacy and control over their content without having to resort to manual deletion or account purging.

I believe that privacy is a fundamental right, and we should have the ability to control who sees our content. I’m interested in hearing your thoughts on this matter. How do you feel about the current privacy settings on Lemmy? What changes would you like to see? Let’s start a conversation and work towards making Lemmy a platform that respects and upholds our privacy.

  • Steve@communick.newsEnglish
    433·
    10 months ago

    The very nature of Lemmy and most social media, is that what you put out there is public. If you don’t want everyone in the world to read something you wrote, then social media may not be your kind of thing.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        12·
        10 months ago

        And I believe privacy defeatism is unhealthy.

        Is there such a thing as “perfect privacy?”

        Because it seems that, to exist in society, is to give up some form of privacy by dint of existing in it.

        You cannot stop yourself from being observed by other people, if they can see you. That’s just basic reality.

        To be completely private, you would have to live in the woods and not interact with anyone or speak with anyone.

        Is it defeatist to be realistic about the limitations of the idea of privacy?

        As someone who has spent a lot of time seeking internet privacy, I’ve learned that more often than not I’m making myself more conspicuous. That doesn’t mean I’m going to give up on privacy, but it does mean that I’m going to consider its limitations.

        EDIT: I’m reminded of an interview with Mark Hossler from Negativland. The interview is long gone from the internet (it was on an obscure website pre-youtube) but the center of it always stuck with me.

        “If you really want full control of your art, don’t show it to anybody, keep it in your home.” His argument was Richard Dawkins’ argument for memes. The human mind functions by copying and mimicking. When someone else has viewed your artwork, they’ve already created an internal image of it in their memory. That memory is inconsistent with reality, but if they have a good memory, they can recreate it relatively easily (if they have similar artistic skills). You can’t really stop that kind of copying from happening, so the only way to fight it and keep “complete control” is to not share it at all.

        Similarly, the only way to have complete control over your privacy is by not interacting with anyone at all.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
                1·
                10 months ago

                It was an mov file embedded in a wordpress personal blog. I remember no details about the blog save the interview with Hossler.

                It was maybe a five minute interview, and I remember it was while Mark Hossler was setting up an art showing, so while he was literally hanging up paintings during the interview. It looked like a less professional interviewer, who was interviewing Hossler more as a fan than a journalist. The camerawork was pretty okay and a little more clear (from what I recall) than the videos already posted. I would guess the time from between 2002-2007ish, from before YouTube to right about when it came out.