They are legitimate reviews.
$argon2id$v=19$m=64,t=512,p=2$UYIBCdPUJek0ndf9GUcBtA$8C2G7+xwpPBiaoybb7ZjgA
They are legitimate reviews.
Their cause being… recommending against buying some games?
You start from a false premise. The reason for curators on Steam is that recommendations pro/against a game appear on the game’s store page.
It allows you to avoid stuff that someone already played and knows you won’t like.
Steam Curators curate recommendation lists that users can subscribe to based on what they like / don’t like.
If I already don’t want to hear anything about LGBT, then I will follow curators like this. It’s not the other way around.
It is. Both SerenityOS and Ladybird are courageous projects, easy target for this drama.
As a fork of Redis there is Valkey, maintained by the Linux Foundation and licensed under BSD-3-clause.
Yes, sink a valuable Free software because they won’t accept something you and I believe in.
It’s incredibly selfish and stupid.
Hundeds of thousands of people.
Servo is going to fill that void
Some people care about privacy.
Blind people shouldn’t need to give up their privacy to Microsoft and Google to have a web page read to them.
Why are we not using them in end-user devices
Bad photographers complaining to be called out as bad photographers.
Their distribution of books is completely legal.
Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour.
That’s why the Archive is appealing: they still believe they are right.
Wikipedia requires attribution, which AI scrapers never give.
It is “public” work, but under a license.
Then maybe it shouldn’t grow.
It seems a very valid reason to give up your privacy.
You could present your valid argument without calling in homophobia.
It’s not against ToS. Curation lists discriminate no one.