![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/3d87a809-b49f-47a2-b46e-2d85d7d2f7a4.png)
Stability is indeed a strength of EU - effectively averaging over all the countries smooths over political oscillations - which is useful for tackling long-term policy problems (like climate). I’m not advocating majoritarian voting where 51% overrides 49%. However with ± 30 countries, one or two should not block the rest - the current system leads to transactional brinkmanship where the last hold-outs get some prize in return for postponed obstruction. I’ve seen similar (worse) problems in UN climate negotiations - also due to “consensus” principle.
Key message remains that methane is “the strongest lever we can quickly pull to reduce warming”.
It’s not runaway, but there is a positive feedback of methane increasing its own lifetime by using up atmospheric oxidising capacity. I note also, new to me - “an increase in decomposition rates from wetlands as higher temperatures interacted with La Niña conditions in the tropics” - so during El Niño we get more CO2 from forest fires, but during La Niña more CH4 … - how to lock-in that carbon ? I also wonder how much methane is coming from Russia recently, whose government cares the least of all.