Killing people isn’t always illegal, and you forgot hunting, euthanasia, and target shooting.
Killing people isn’t always illegal, and you forgot hunting, euthanasia, and target shooting.
Guns have useful legal purposes and specific constitutional protections though. Cars don’t. The number of people going track racing in their SUVs has to be essentially zero.
TL;DR: Only 56% of Americans plan on taking a summer vacation this year.
For comparison:
deleted by creator
Um, but actual Irish-Americans love eating corned beef and cabbage on St. Patrick’s day. It’s racist to celebrate your heritage? Or just to try things from other people’s cultures?
India—it’s Veeba.
Libraries buy licenses to do so from the publishers, but that’s unrelated to what I said.
I’m saying the judge found that IA violated its own CDL, so even if its interpretation of the law was correct, the IA would still be liable.
Libraries do not make unlimited copies of books so everyone can check it out at the same time without wait. Obviously the EFF doesn’t want to admit its client did that because it destroys their case, but that’s what the judge found the IA stupidly did.
More it still exists because they were literally incapable of replacing it. They weren’t good quality; people just didn’t have any other options. I’m sure we can make our cars last just as long if we clamp the screws tighter and ensure no one can afford to buy a new car.
Disinfectant ≠ pesticide
Obviously every COVID policy everywhere is heavily criticized after the fact by someone, but that likely saved lives.
That post was two months before Reddit announced it was going to make API changes.
Donating to GIMP will not likely make it user-friendly enough to make me use it unless absolutely forced to. I would much rather donate to Pinta or Paint.NET or something where development would actually benefit me.
It depends on what you call “itty bitty” and “wealth”. Saving $1,000/month is doable for many people and will make you a millionaire by retirement age, even adjusting for inflation.
It’s literally a victimless crime committed unintentionally. Most people oppose 12-year prison sentences for harmless accidents.
Nah, it happens with Democrats just as much:
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0KN0A0/
I think you underestimate just how much tribalism there is in politics.
Why would Hamas care about losing support from younger Americans or what the Kremlin thinks? Their sole goal is to achieve Arabic unity by escalating Arabic-Jewish hostilities.
Everything has some rate of death. That doesn’t make it reckless. Are you saying anyone who owns another dog or who rides a bikes or who has a tree in his yard or who cooks food or who performs surgery which leads to someone’s death should also get [5–10 years in prison] no matter what?
Thank you for this knowledge. This will honestly help me eat more chicken instead of less-messy frozen meals.
Drunk driving has an incomparably higher fatality rate though. (Like 1 in 600 vs pits’ 1 in 500,000)
And you can’t be charged with murder for drunk driving. That’s reckless homicide.
If a horse or cow breaks its leg, what’s a less painful method? A properly-aimed bullet is instant and 100% painless. You gonna call a vet, wait half a day if you’re lucky, and then hope they give chemicals quickly and correctly while the animal languishs in pain?