![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Which you can learn about…in Maus. Ffs.
Which you can learn about…in Maus. Ffs.
Okay, but didn’t that happen in an environment where ket was not legally available for people who may be able to benefit from it? Like…that shit already happens. And yeah it sucks.
Do you not feel he would have benefited from it being legal when he attempted to seek treatment? Might he have had less motivation to steal and suck his landlords dick if the illegal market didn’t make the drugs so cost prohibitive?
I think allowing people who abuse them to, well, abuse them is an acceptable byproduct of also helping meaningfully treated various other peoples depression.
It’s not one or the other.
I’m ok with them harming some innocent people in the process of killing themselves. Greater good.
Eminem used the term in the song ‘Criminal’ which came out 24 years ago.
Yep. And I’d argue it’s an almost ethical responsibility for those aware of all this to preserve a media archive via piracy. Sort of like those monks that would repeatedly copy old scrolls before they would degrade or whatever.
Oh well that’s reasonable then /s
No, that doesn’t end until idiots stop agreeing to it when offered…which won’t happen any time soon.
And it was always clearly stated as such. It’s absurd that anyone was upset by this. I have yet to find a single user on here who did not properly understand what it was for, or at least none willing admit to being that dumb.
Who gets to be the parents in this situation?
Completely agree and I was referring only to this specific instance.
I agree with all points, but isn’t the officer who stopped it from continuing the ‘good guy with a gun’ here?
It’s almost like it’s possible to have good guys with guns without letting every single person get guns by default.
I really hope you’re right.
I still think it takes more effort to coordinate the theft of others work etc to become a billionaire compared to simply inherently a billionaire dollars. But this doesn’t mean I morally value either.
They won’t spell out anything it seems, as it would require them admitting their true position which they are ashamed of…or something? I’m as confused as you are, but also would quite like a free Patagonia sweater.
That wouldn’t get anyone banned though.
As evidenced by me saying: ‘I wish harm to JK Rowling’.
Also I legitimately don’t understand your last question.
I’m just trying to clarify their final position.
deleted by creator
Well yeah. Weighing out 500g 400 times and then cutting into 6 pieces is going to be a lot faster than weighing out 83 grams 2400 times with no cutting after. Some variance between sizes of pieces is fine.