![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
Fuck moon channel, dude is so full of himself and confidently wrong that he will defend charity fraud for his own ego. See his whole arguments and exchanges with Karl Jobst about the Jirard (The Completionist) and indieland donations incident
Fuck moon channel, dude is so full of himself and confidently wrong that he will defend charity fraud for his own ego. See his whole arguments and exchanges with Karl Jobst about the Jirard (The Completionist) and indieland donations incident
No worries, I completely get your frustrations. Not voting in general is the dumbest thing one can do in that situation, especially when one of the options is a fascistic clown. I get that you’re very passionate about this, and I hope I haven’t come of as (too) harsh in my reply as well.
I never said that abstaining from voting is the right move here, quite the opposite, I’m completely for harm reduction and would vote for the democrat option everytime. Don’t know how you got that from my post. It’s just so weird for me that none of the blame is placed on the democratic party and it’s establishment canidates doing jack-shit and when they lost in 2016 because of sheer incompetency, it’s somehow the fault of “leftists abstaining to vote” (any sources on that claim? Anyone got any stats on that?)
Also, drop the sarcastic tone when you lack reading comprehention this much. Nowhere in my post was abstaining to vote even implied to be the best course of action (it’s not), I was just asking why noone seems to blame the DNC for it’s incompetency.
Non-american here, why is it that the 2016 election was lost because of a “leftists not voting” boogeyman instead of Hillary Clinton being a deeply unsympathetic canidate, pushing away an objectively better canidate (Bernie) because it was “her time”, and doing jack-shit to visit swing states to give speeches? From what I remember, she did the bare minimum because she thought she would have the election in the bag anyway.
Oh, and that whole court thing, wasn’t that because of that piece of shit democrat judge not retiring under obama because she had some main character syndrome or something and instead decided to die under a republican president? Why is she not the one at fault here?
The “G” in “Lasagna” is silent
Professor, turn off my cringe inhibitors
Yes, after discussing the same points in a reddit thread with him and not realising he was wrong and did no research (watching youtube is no research), instead being a bitchy, hairsplitting ass with a holier-than-thou attitude, while also insulting other people who calmly tried to direct him to the discord call that he conveniently left out of his “youtube research”, only to “work things out” later after Karl did a 1.5hr slam-dunk video on his incompetency.
I guess he is allowed to do this, doing no research and shitting out a video with a sponsor, while simultaneously accusing Karl of doing this for money (who has by his own word lost 8k$ for cancelling a sponsor for his first coverage video btw), behaved like a spoiled little child until the Karl video on him dropped, because he is a lawyer (for a completely different field than the field that charity fraud or embezzlement would fall under anyway btw).
Yes, they worked things out after he was forced to, until then he did everything wrong to not have to admit being wrong. If this guy will have a better standing or stands to gain by lying to you, he WILL lie to your face.
Oh and he didn’t want to delete his misinformation video until getting backlash from Karl’s fanbase to do so, shows how much commitment to the truth he has.
(Not a Karl Jobst fan, can’t stand his personality actually. Him shining light on the charity fraud was very important and appreciated.)
(Also his video with Phoenix Wright animations and music was ironic and very cringe.)