snixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10
arrow-up16arrow-down1imageWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlsnixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squaredustojnikhummer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoNo you can’t because the dependency doesn’t exit anymore.
minus-squaredustojnikhummer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoYes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure
minus-squareriskable@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIf you’re trying to get ancient software to work I think “user friendliness” is the least of your concerns. Especially compared to the alternative (Windows) where the answer is just, “No: That’s not going to work no matter what you do.”
No you can’t because the dependency doesn’t exit anymore.
Then compile it from the sources
Yes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure
If you’re trying to get ancient software to work I think “user friendliness” is the least of your concerns. Especially compared to the alternative (Windows) where the answer is just, “No: That’s not going to work no matter what you do.”