• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    you run into the same issue: being hyperbolic here doesn’t really work if literally the same week of your hyperbole, something directly countering the hyperbolic point you’re making happens. hyperbole isn’t non-falsifiable or unimpeachable just because it’s hyperbole and intended to be humorous–you can still be hyperbolically wrong, and in this case you are.

    • ram@bookwormstory.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, hyperbole is non-falsefiable. It’s a rhetorical device, not a claim unto itself. In this instance it’s a rhetorical device being used to communicate the idea that, were this Nintendo, they’d be receiving rightful backlash, but people, like you, online will give a pass due to the sheer fact that it’s Valve doing the takedown.

      • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        were this Nintendo, they’d be receiving rightful backlash, but people, like you, online will give a pass due to the sheer fact that it’s Valve doing the takedown.

        well… now you’re indicating that this kind of isn’t hyperbole from you, because you’re just straight arguing the underlying (and still incorrect) “hyperbolic” point now, lol

        Yes, hyperbole is non-falsefiable. It’s a rhetorical device, not a claim unto itself.

        i mean i think this is just obviously ridiculous. if someone said “every person who dislikes Valve is a pedophile who hurts children” or whatever hyperbolically i think it’d be silly to say that’s non-falsifiable just because it’s hyperbolic. there’s still an underlying and incorrect claim being made