• Snowpix@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who downvoted this? Conservatism has always been an ideology that’s opposed to progress, democracy and freedom. It holds back society to preserve tradition and “family values” while promoting xenophobia, bigotry, and unquestioned submission to authority. The most conservative states in the United States are also some of the poorest, with the lowest standards of living, and also the most backwards. It isn’t much different in other countries. The Nazis were conservative. Islamic countries with Sharia Law are conservative. And right now, American Conservatives are trying to implement a Christian-flavoured Sharia Law.

    • 5 Card Draw@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservatism Capitalism has always been an ideology that’s opposed to progress, democracy and freedom.

      There you go, I fixed that for you.

      All political entities serve the needs of capital first and foremost in a capitalist system, people are only a secondary…if that.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Speaking as a Marxist, this is false. Capitalism was once the historical progressive force against feudalism. This was already waning two centuries ago, but it was not always true.

        • Quit_this_instance@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Glad another Marxist said it. The problem isn’t that capitalism was always the wrong choice, it’s that we’re clinging to it long beyond its best before date.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure but did capitlism really defeat feudalism? Seems like the other side of the same coin.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, it did, though vestiges still remain. That’s what the French Revolution overwhelmingly was, the bourgeoisie claiming power over the old feudal nobility and the monarchy (as anything but a figurehead). Also the American revolution and many others.

            They resemble each other because they are in all cases the “owning class” claiming the seat as the “ruling class”, just as the slaveholders of classical antiquity and the patriarchs of pre-historical agrarian/pastoral societies.

            It’s kind of a tangent, but in explaining the concept of equality, Lenin discusses some of the differences between feudalism and liberal capitalism in a letter here.

            There are places such as Thailand and Bhutan where the struggle is still alive between the two modes of production, but those are the very rare exceptions to the global order of liberal capitalism (in various forms) vs whatever you want to call the theocratic capitalism of Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. vs the state socialism of the PRC, Cuba, etc.

    • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are a lot of conservatives here thanks to Reddit. Tankie hysteria allows them to speak in parallel to the radlibs and anarcho-bidenists without too much dispute, so they have blended in. Funny how that works.