Happy new year

  • Blaine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There are only five sentences of text on that page, with the last one explaining that this sort of marriage was not common at all. Where did you get the idea that the textbook is suggesting that this was the norm?

    • randomsnark@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The second paragraph to the right of the photo talks about how our perception of these things changes with time, and while it seems shocking to us now it would once have been taken for granted. It was a big news story at the time and was not taken for granted.

      Edit: I guess my wording was a bit off. I meant to say that it was not within the cultural norms of the time. As worded, it sounds like I’m discussing its frequency rather than its level of acceptance - that’s my bad.

      Intended meaning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_norm

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        Given that the law was passed two weeks after they were married I think it has already been drafted and the whole subject was probably one of much debate. Also note three neighbouring states passed laws at the same time.

        It seems likely that someone said “find a story about under-age marriage for our front page”, and these two hapless yokels (or should I say Johns the hapless yokel) were the only ones stupid enough to have their photos taken.

        In summary, I think society was working up to passing a law like this, and these two had a bride that was younger than most and got married at the right time.

        That said, the author has definitely tried to imply that this sort of marriage was commonplace in the 30s, when it was probably at most “unusual”.