A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a California law that would have banned carrying firearms in most public places, ruling that it violates the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and deprives people of their ability to defend themselves and their loved ones.

The law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September was set to take effect Jan. 1. It would have prohibited people from carrying concealed guns in 26 places including public parks and playgrounds, churches, banks and zoos. The ban would apply whether the person has a permit to carry a concealed weapon or not. One exception would be for privately owned businesses that put up signs saying people are allowed to bring guns on their premises.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    America was founded by guns and it is chock full of them. There is no way to put that genie back in the bottle.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There literally is, it’s called a constitutional amendment and they’ve been enacted many times before.

      Of course, there’s not the political will for it, because, like I said, The US is so fucking dumb.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Hey guys, they passed a constitutional amendment. We better turn all our guns in.”

        -Like 4 Americans

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Guns wouldn’t disappear overnight ofc. But make owning guns illegal, arrest people who own them and create buyback programs. It might take some time. It might be super fast.

          But you know what for sure wouldn’t solve anything? Doing nothing.

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Australia did it and it worked pretty well for them. You just make gun ownership illegal, ask for them back in a reasonable timeframe, and then tell the cops to stop murdering unarmed black people for a minute to go chase down the rest of the guns that weren’t turned in at the end of the process. Then when youre done, you disincentivize bad actors by ramping up the penalties for gun possession significantly, and actually enforce those laws.

          It’s not hard, just needs to be done.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          If people want to be felons that’s their choice, but it’s absurd to suggest any armed resistance would occur, or matter, in such an instance

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        As the previous person said there is no way to get it done. Yes there is something called a constitutional amendment, but if there is no realistic way to get it passed then effectively there is no way to get it done.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          As the previous person said there is no way to get it done

          The “we’ve tried nothing and were all out of isdeas” approach…

          • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I mean, I think California just tried something. New York, D.C., New Jersey, Illinois/Chicago, and some other places too.

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think guns and abortion are great distractions because both sides will never stop fighting for them.

        Meanwhile, we’re all getting fucked as the disparity in wealth continues to grow.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            But will they discuss more than one issue at a time? It’s still completely valid to point out how asinine and unnecessary some conversations are. Eating up room is a valid deflection strategy, after all.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t think it is productive to talk about gun regulation and abortion in the same conversation.

              • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I’m not saying you should mix convos… I’m saying stop dragging out the stupid ones. The other poster is fully correct when they say some conversations are beyond meaningless and are absolutely used to distract people from bigger issues.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s only a stupid argument if you don’t care about children being shot up in schools. Me, I care about that.

                  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Nice gaslighting. Where did I ever say I disagree that it’s a problem? Are you seriously going to get so upset that you’re going to miss the utterly obvious point of, “don’t take the topic change bait”? It’s literally the main way people deploy what-about-ism…

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sure there is. It’s easy.

      Just start giving black people guns.

      The so-called second amendment absolutists will be calling for draconian gun control measures within a week.

    • doppelgangmember@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Here’s a solution:

      Ban straw sales/gun show loopholes, improve auditing/background checks, do gun buybacks above rate, and ban AR sales after X date. Bought before the date, you’re grandfathered in but can’t sell/gift the weapon.

    • doppelgangmember@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Here’s a solution:

      Ban straw sales/gun show loopholes, improve auditing/background checks, do gun buybacks above rate, and ban AR sales after X date. Bought before the date, you’re grandfathered in but can’t sell/gift the weapon.