• Sanyanov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot extreme opinion: copyright shouldn’t exist, and authors should be covered by other means, particularly public funding based on usage numbers and donations.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The world got essentially all classical music, the painting on the ceiling of the Sistine chapel, etc. without the need for copyright. Shakespeare’s work wasn’t protected by copyrights either. So, it’s not like amazing works of art require copyright. They’ll happen regardless. It’s more about how artists are incentivized to create and who profits.

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bonus point: they will be about passion, not the money.

        Not saying money shouldn’t be there - we need to support free creators so they could make a living and pursue their passion - but copyright is too often not about that in particular, being owned often not by the authors and squeezing everything if the creation gets popular.