I’ve heard arguments for both sides and i think it’s more complicated then simply yes or no. what do you guys think?

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Judges have ruled that they can’t be copyrighted because of this lack of a true author, and I agree.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Fairly sure that was a case where the guy wanted to give the copyright to the ai algorithm itself and not about the copyrightability of the art. Specifically, he wanted them to be copyrighted as “as a work-for-hire to the owner of the Creativity Machine” - creativity machine is the name of the algorithm. Basically just a modern version of the monkey selfie kerfuffle.