• 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do you remember when the US Army asked “how has serving impacted you?” on Twitter and the most common answers were PTSD, harassment, rape? Maybe that’s why.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fight who? Our biggest threat climate change caused by multinational corporations. Often the same ones that our soldiers are deployed for.

    • FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m an oif veteran, and I honestly don’t think we’ve fought for our country since pearl harbor

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ukraine isn’t my country. They’re fighting for their country.

        My point wasn’t that “fighting for your country” isn’t a thing that happens; my point was that the many fights the United States involved itself in over the last 30+ years…aren’t that.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            If there’s one thing I can guarantee is on no Ukrainian soldier’s mind right now, it’s “What will happen to America if we lose?”

            A foreign power has invaded their country, and they’re fighting back. Ukraine is on the right side of history here. They don’t need you to grandstand for them.

                • Is it grand standing if it’s true? There are absolutely Ukrainians who believe they are fighting to stop a modern fascist form invading all of Europe and pressing through to America, the country which led the international response to the invasion and which is Ukraine’s political and economic partner over the past decade. I know they aren’t defending America so to say as fervently as they are defending their home, but they know what is at stake.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      … And its 1, 2,3 what are we fighting for?

      Don’t ask me I don’t give a damn,

      The next stop is Vietnam,

      And its 5, 6,7 open up the pearly gates,

      Well there ain’t no time to wonder why,

      WHOOPEE we’re all gonna die

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d definitely fight FOR our country. But I would not fight for our country and those that currently control it. They’re after all, the ones we have to fight against.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Not really. You just need to go back to my first post in this thread. Explains it perfectly. The country itself. I would fight to save it from the people that currently run it. But I would not fight for (in service of) the country and the people that currently run it.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                The country isn’t, like, its own entity. America isn’t real. There isn’t some ideological spirit of America that you can separate from the people that run it. At most you could argue that America is also its culture, but uh, the culture has been pretty fucking bad since the start!

                American society is terrible. America’s government is terrible. American culture is terrible. It’s an irredeemable shithole country.

                What the fuck would you fight for?

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Actually there is. They talk and talk and talk about it ad nauseam. They simply just do it rhetorically and always fail to embody it. Even countries with a traditionally large immigrant population like the United States have a lot more culturally that tends to bind, then they have differences that divide. And after all what is a country? If not the people in it?

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    why in the fuck would any sane person sign up to die in a failed attempt to implement some shitty politician’s whim half a world away? no one has fought for America in decades, they fight for the aristocrats.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s because Democrats are brainwashing people to hate their country and has absolutely nothing to do with Republicans voting AGAINST any and all help for veterans, Republicans constantly stopping service member pay with government shutdowns, billionaires killing us so they can make an extra dollar, billionaires using us to do dangerous tasks for minimal pay or Republicans voting to dismantle the VA. It’s OBVIOUSLY the Democrats fault!

  • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Almost everyone I know that went into the military did it for the experience and to be able to go to college. That was when people believed a college degree would set you up for a stable future. Now that millennials know this isn’t true and we’re not lying to gen Z, they sure as shit don’t believe it either.

    The military should add to its incentives. If the military could for example, build you a modest home then I’m sure people would start joining again.

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, in a roundabout sort of way, the military does do that. If you’re active duty, you earn an okay salary (compared to other jobs whose entry requirement is a passing GED), but a significant portion of your paycheck is composed of nontaxable benefit payments. For example, BAH or Basic Allowance for Housing. As a junior NCO in a low cost of living state, I was getting nearly a thousand dollars a month specifically to offset housing costs. That afforded me the opportunity to rent a very nice apartment I would not have been able to afford on my salary alone. If I had chosen to rent a cheaper place, or cohabitate with someone, I would have been able to pocket the difference. I also received something like $400 ish for food in the form of the Basic Allowance for Subsistence stipend. Not to mention free healthcare through Tricare. Additionally, most veterans qualify for the VA Home Loan program, in which the government guarantees a portion of your mortgage, which can mean better rates from lenders vs a civilian.

      So, while the military isn’t necessarily out here building homes for folks (that being said, I’ve stayed in on base housing before, and most places certainly qualify as modest single family homes), they do provide tools that vets can use to make that a reality.

      Does the incentives balance out against the cons of military service? For me, they did. For others, maybe not.

      • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Thanks, yeah I think in service benefits are great but life after the military is always the pain point. The military sometimes has crazy signing bonuses and you get the GI bill as well, I think if the military appealed to people’s life after service more then more people would sign up. Maybe do that in place of the GI bill. Homes are crazy right now because there aren’t enough homes, not so much because they’re expensive to build.

        Unless you go with an MOS that you’d like to do after the military, a lot of the time the skills you learn don’t really transfer to civilian life. Young adults don’t usually know what they’d find rewarding and the recruiters can often trick you into some job you didn’t want. I wouldn’t recommend it to most people.

  • AmberPrince@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Eustice, who served 26 years in the Minnesota National Guard, noted that young adults were the military’s prime target for new recruits—currently Generation Z, or those born after 1997—and argued that growing up in the internet age had made them used to “immediate gratification.”

    Oh look, another out of touch boomer. ItS tHoSe DaMn CeLlPhOnEs! Gen Z grew up watching America get involved in, then stay involved in, a deeply unpopular war. Gen Z grew up in an age where you can fact check someone on the spot and it makes it that much harder for recruiters to lie. They grew up in an age where half of the government is trying to drag the country backwards by any means.

    I am in the military. I overheard my leadership talking with a woman who wanted to get out. When they asked her why she said it was because of the Roe V Wade decision. “Why would I fight for a country that won’t fight for me?” I don’t blame her.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      A person saying kids don’t want to join the military because they’re too used to “instant gratification” is some of the most obnoxious shit I have ever heard lmao

      If someone went up to me and said that, I’d tell them to go fuck themselves and leave, because fuck all of that.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ah well, soldiers haven’t fought for their country for decades. Instead they’ve been fighting for the interest of industrialized military, and the whims of politicians.

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean why would someone want to fight for a country that doesn’t care about them?

  • Numberone@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean when we watch decades of wars that kill thousands of American’s and MILLIONS of people in their own countries for no reason, maybe we need a little additional justification rather than “fight for your country”. Nah! Probably just the fault of the “instant gratification” generations being selfish again.

    We see more, and trust less now. Seems like a good first order explanation to me anyway.

  • phikshun@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’ll end up with PTSD, divorced and homeless, but think of all the brown people you’ll get to kill in the name of our Lord and Savior, Walt Disney.

  • tryplot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    A country is supposed to provide 4 things to it’s citizens, and the united states are failing on all 4.

    1. food: “We are in danger of running out of food,” said Vince Hall, Feeding America’s chief government relations officer. “We are doing everything we can to avert a major hunger crisis.

    2. safe to drink water: Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals,’ government study finds

    3. shelter: Homelessness rates have been climbing nationally by about 6% every year since 2017, the alliance said.

    4. safety: The record 48,830 total gun deaths in 2021 reflect a 23% increase since 2019

    additionally, nearly every fundamental system (education, healthcare, insurance, car-dependent city designs, etc.) within the united states is designed to take everything away (or restrict access to everything) from it’s citizens through poverty, thus making the above problems exponentially worse.

    What is there to fight for?