• kirklennon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At that point, why even go for a laptop, vs. what would clearly be a high end desktop station?

    Because you can take that high-end computer with you across the room, on a plane, or anywhere else.

    • dukk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s all true, but who really needs that kind of power?

      For some people it’s worth it. For most people? Probably not.

      IMHO the MacBook Airs and the M1/2 MBPs are looking pretty good right now.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Today I sat in a meeting I didn’t care much for and was able to run my project’s unittests. They take a long time to run, like an hour and a half if run on a single thread. But with an M2 Max I can run it all in ~10 minutes or so, and the power efficiency is such that I don’t have to worry about it. I previously had an XPS 15, and it both took longer and also I could kill it in an hour doing this, so any intensive tasks like this were only for when I had wall power.

        It’s definitely not necessary for casual use, but there are definitely use cases that benefit from having a ton of power in a laptop.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s all true, but who really needs that kind of power?

        The people featured in the presentation: music and video production people, medical researchers, machine learning experts. The MacBook Air is their most popular notebook. The MacBook Pro is for people who actually need more (with a new lower-tier MacBook Pro added for morons who insist they need a “pro” model but really don’t).