• JesusLikesYourButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like it would be better to phrase that as you found them uninteresting.

    Or did you mean they are un-interesting in a way most of society would say someone is uninteresting. Like they aren’t interesting because they don’t follow sports or TV shows? Or they only talk about work or kids? Those people can still be interesting, just to different types of people.

    They may not be interested in being interesting for other people?

    • Bob@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s very tough to describe people who aren’t interesting in order to tell you why they’re not interesting, now I’ve set about doing it. It’s like describing a colour.

        • Bob@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, in the real world where normal people live, no, but philosophically, fine yeah. But then if you want to be philosophical I’d go further and call that equivocation between “interesting: piquing my curiosity in a way I like” and “interesting: some remark can be made”, and I don’t find the latter interesting to think about anyway.