• stewsters@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless you have been locked in a sensory deprivation tank for your whole life, and have independently developed the English language, you too have learned from other people’s content.

    • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well my knowledge can’t be used as a tool of surveillance by the government and the corporations and I have my own feelings intent and everything in between. AI is artifical inteligence, Ai is not an artificial person. AI doesn’t have thoughts, feelings or ideals. AI is a tool, an empty shell that is used to justify stealing data and survelience.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        This very comment is a resource that government and corporations can use for surveillance and training.

        • Hexarei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          We may not know what comprises A thought, but I think we know it’s not matrix math. Which is basically all an LLM is

          • MikuNPC@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hard disagree, the neural connections in the brain can be modeled with matrix math as well. Sure some people will be uncomfortable with that notion, especially if they believe in spiritual stuff outside physical reality. But if you’re the type that thinks consciousness is an emergent phenomenon from our underlying biology then matrix math is a reasonable approach to representing states of our mind and what we call thoughts.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yet we live in a world where people will profit from the work and creativity of others without paying any of it back to the creator. Creating something is work, and we don’t live in a post-scarcity communist utopia. The issue is the “little guy” always getting fucked over in a system that’s pay-to-play.

      Donating effort to the greater good of society is commendable, but people also deserve to be compensated for their work. Devaluing the labor of small creators is scummy.

      • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m working on a tabletop setting inspired by the media I consumed. If I choose to sell it, I’ll be damned if I’m going to pay royalties to the publishers of every piece of media that inspired me.

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you were a robot that never needed to eat or sleep and could generate 10,000 tabletop RPGs an hour with little to no creative input then I might be worried about whether or not those media creators were compensated.

            • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              It absolutely should, especially when the “creator” is not a person. AI is not “inspired” by training data, and any comparisons to human artists being inspired by things they are exposed to are made out of ignorance of both the artistic process and how AI generates images and text.

              • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s impossible to make any comparison between how AI and how humans make decisions without understanding the nature of consciousness. Simply understanding how AI works isn’t enough.

                • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  None of which means it is impossible to determine whether or not an algorithm that couldn’t exist without the work of countless artists should have the same IP rights as a human being making art (the answer is no).

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            When, not if, such a robot exists, do you imagine we’ll pay everyone who’d ever published a roleplaying game? Like a basic income exclusively for people who did art before The Training?

            Or should the people who want things that couldn’t exist without magic content engines be denied, to protect some prior business model? Bear in mind this is the literal Luddite position. Weavers smashed looms. Centuries later, how much fabric in your life do you take for granted, thanks to that machinery?

            ‘We have to stop this labor-saving technology because of capitalism’ is a boneheaded way to deal with any conflict between labor-saving technology… and capitalism.

            • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know this is shocking to people who have never picked up a brush or written anything other than internet arguments after the state stopped mandating they do so when they graduated high school, but you can just create shit without AI. Literal children can do it.

              And there is no such thing as something that “couldn’t exist” without the content stealing algorithm. There is nothing it can create that humans can’t, but humans can create things it can’t.

              There’s also something hilarious about the idea that the real drag on the artistic process was the creating art part. God almighty, I’d rather be a Luddite than a Philistine.

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fuck off.

                If that sounds needlessly blunt, no, it’s far kinder than your vile opening insult, which you can’t even keep straight - immediately noting that everyone, even children, has done an art at some point.

                So maybe this discussion of wild new technology versus 17th-century law and the grindstone of capitalism isn’t about individual moral failings of people who disagree with you.

          • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Those 10000 tabletop RPGs will almost certainly be completely worthless on their own, but might contain some novel ideas. Until a human comes by and scours it for ideas and combines it. It could very well be that in the same time it could only create 1 coherent tabletop RPG idea.

            Should be mentioned though, AIs don’t run for free either, they cost quite a lot of electricity and require expensive hardware.