• Chariotwheel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, now I got what you wanted. I misunderstood you, I thought you meant that the surpression of the GDR itself was natural. But you meant what happened after the regime and people had the choice to join the church freely again.

    That I agree with.

    • taladar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, basically I meant that some religious people tend to argue that religion is some sort of natural need that people have and even if religion was not passed on to children they would flock to it on their own. It seems that is not the case though or a one generation interruption would not have this large of an effect decades later.

      • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do believe that a lot of religions kinda made sense in the past to underline laws and start building a cohesise society. In a sense the old testament is a book of laws with just a lot of fluff. And while a lot of it aged badly, you can see how a lot of rules made sense at the time (e.g. food safety). I do believe that this was the original purpose of this. To strenghten the belief in laws by adding a mystical component on top of them for people who weren’t as firm with written laws and a believe in a justice system.

        These days, of course, it’s archaic and unnessary.