cross-posted from: https://dubvee.org/post/205595

WASHINGTON, Sept 25 (Reuters) - U.S. Federal Communications Commission chair Jessica Rosenworcel plans to begin an effort to reinstate landmark net neutrality rules rescinded under then-President Donald Trump, sources briefed on the matter said Monday.

The move comes after Democrats took majority control of the five-member FCC on Monday for the first time since President Joe Biden took office in January 2021 when new FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez was sworn in.

The FCC is set to take an initial vote on the net neutrality proposal in October, the sources added.

In July 2021, Biden signed an executive order encouraging the FCC to reinstate net neutrality rules adopted under Democratic then-President Barack Obama in 2015.

The FCC voted in 2017 to reverse the rules that barred internet service providers from blocking or throttling traffic, or offering paid fast lanes, also known as paid prioritization. Days before the 2020 presidential election, the FCC voted to maintain the reversal.

Rosenworcel denounced the repeal in 2017 saying it put the FCC “on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of the law, and the wrong side of the American public.”

She plans a speech to outline her plans on Tuesday, the sources added. A spokesperson for Rosenworcel declined to comment.

In 2022, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 that the 2017 decision by the FCC to reverse federal net neutrality protections could not bar state action, rejecting a challenge from telecom and broad industry groups to block California’s net neutrality law. Industry groups abandoned further legal challenges in May 2022.

The appeals court said that since the FCC reclassified internet services in 2017 as more lightly regulated information services, the commission “no longer has the authority to regulate in the same manner that it had when these services were classified as telecommunications services.”

Days after Biden took office, the U.S. Justice Department withdrew its Trump-era legal challenge to California’s state net neutrality law.

  • JWBananas@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to preface this by saying I am genuinely asking. I did a bunch of searching and only found articles about what may or what could

    But can anyone name concrete examples of what actually did change for them after the end of net neutrality?

    Again, I am genuinely asking. I support net neutrality. But I cannot recall any way that the repeal actually affected me personally.

    Please share your stories.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A lot of ISPs were already dodging the old, weak rules anyway out of an abundance of caution. Instead of doing any direct pay-for-play, they started doing other policies that sounded pro consumer but lead inevitably to the same non-netural, corporate-controlled world.

      For example, T-Mobile favoring huge video streaming platforms over smaller competition by exempting the big boys from data caps. An act of profound, malicious evil that did more to end the idea of neutral networks than ANY lobbying could have, and which most people still think of as totally fine. I’m also pretty sure that predated Ajit Pai.

      I think this is whole question is a great example of when the industry genuinely would prefer clear rules and has been quite nervous to act absent clear rules. The unstable nature of neutral network policy at a high level meant the entire zone was a bit of a minefield, so they’ve been very cautious about dipping toes.

    • Thembo McBembo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Immediately after, every single ISP in my area introduced “data caps”. If I use more than 1TB of total data in a month, they charge exorbitant fees. Fortunately, you can pay to remove these caps! …for nearly twice the monthly price.

        • Umbrias@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It could. Data caps often don’t exist for big players, something individual consumers do have to deal with anymore. Net neutrality directly targets these kinds of disparities.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most states implemented their own version of Net Neutrality, so to them not much changed.