• Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why dont you tell us you have a paper thin understanding of communism without telling us you have a paper thin understanding of communism…

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s interesting that people always just jump to “communism is when no food,” like there have been no famines or starvation under capitalism.

      Especially when you can note that those problems with food production were basically immediately solved with the extremely deserved death of Lysenkoism.

      • deafboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lysenko wouldn’t be a problem in first place, if he bet his own capital on his hypothesis.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          He also wouldn’t have been a problem if Lenin had had Stalin shot in the head so he could be succeeded by Trotsky or Bukharin, but that’s how it goes in a near dictatorship, I guess.