stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoTourist climbs Brussels statue, breaks itwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1318arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1308arrow-down1external-linkTourist climbs Brussels statue, breaks itwww.bbc.comstopthatgirl7@kbin.social to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square57fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoAlthough I’m only vaguely aware of the German laws, I don’t think other EU nations’ laws differ significantly. Here’s the corresponding law: The insurer shall not be obligated to effect payment if the policyholder has intentionally and unlawfully caused the loss suffered by the third party. Source: Since this was clearly negligence, I think they would be fine. After all, they didn’t intend to damage the statue. Gross negligence is still negligence.
Although I’m only vaguely aware of the German laws, I don’t think other EU nations’ laws differ significantly.
Here’s the corresponding law:
Source:
Since this was clearly negligence, I think they would be fine. After all, they didn’t intend to damage the statue. Gross negligence is still negligence.