• fidodo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does climate friendly meat actually exist? I don’t really understand how, at least not at the volume people eat meat today.

    • riceandbeans161@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      it cannot exist

      meat is inherently the most inefficient way of consuming calories, let alone the pain, suffering and horror it causes.

      there’s no morally or ethically correct way to eat meat, unless you’re an indigenous tribe that literally has no other option.

      • fr0g@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Efficiency of calorie acquisition is not the same as sustainability though. Culling an overpopulation of deer that keeps a forest from developing or an invasive species that is wreaking havoc on an ecosystem can both be a net positive on the ecosystem and in terms of sequestering carbon. Meanwhile growing crops on former rainforest land is a clear net negative.

        Those are edge cases though of course and with your average store selection, going with plant-based will just about always be more sustainable.

        • aeternum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          you have to ask, why are they becoming overpopulated though? And the answer is, because animal ag. Farmers kill the natural predators because they fuck with their animals that we eat.

          • fr0g@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The reason those predator species got killed to near extinction is probably a bit more broad and ugly than just concern for lifestock.

            But you’re correct of course that the main reason for the current overpopulation of many non-invasive species is a lack of predators and they should be reintroduced. But that’s also not a thing that can happen from one day to the next, so even in the most optimistic scenarios some degree of human wildlife management still has a purpose.

          • charje@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Many farmers growing plants for animal feed. Also there are Deer farms that raise deer specifically for the hunting industry.

      • vrojak@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would argue lab grown meat is fine, but afaik it is still more resources intensive to produce than, like, tofu. And it’s not like it’s going to be available in appreciable amounts in the near future.

    • Hillock@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course it exists. There is venison and other wild hunted meat. In many places these animals have to be shot anyhow for population control. Overhunting would be the only issue here.

      Then there are purely pasture fed animals. Especially with goats this is common . But there are also some cattle and pig farms. As long as the land itself wasn’t deforested and is given enough time to repair itself, it’s perfectly sustainable.

      Then there are things like keeping chicken in your garden that are only fed kitchen scraps. Depending on your household size you can even keep 1-2 pigs that way.

      If any of these options are available to you, they can be more environmental friendly than some plant based foods. Locally sourced version is definitely better than having plants shipped across the globe.

      As you said the only issue is the quantity and also the desire for premium cuts. A lot of meat is currently wasted because it’s “undesirable”. Some parts will find their way into animal food but a lot also just gets thrown away.

      • fidodo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the end I said at the volume of consumption we have. If everyone switched to wild game we’d instantly go from over population to over hunting and that’s not sustainable. You wouldn’t be able to support the volume with pasture raised without deforestation either. Raising your own animals also wouldn’t match the volume that people eat meat currently either. Even if we were more efficient with the meat we use I still think we’d be orders of magnitude off. I’m not totalitarian anti meat, I just don’t see any path to sustainability without huge decreases in consumption. The things you pointed out are great, but I think we can’t mislead people into thinking that will be enough for them to not have to change their eating habits.