oldie meme but needed to bring this back due to recent incidents 😭

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    oh okay i get it now. it’s… dense. i usually understand the more complex memes but this one is impenetrable to me. i’m not surprised others had a bad time.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Out of curiosity, have you ever watched a Philomena Cunk show? Drag is wondering if that’s part of what makes the difference

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Bizarre. Are you used to seeing versions of the format where Philomena is 100% right? Drag has seen plenty of memes that do that, and drag thinks they misunderstand the format.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            no i know the format well

            i think the issue is the second panel is asking the audience to infer what the opposite or opposing conclusion the author intends us to come to. and with the text given… it’s not obvious.

            generally, it’s not rhetorically effective to place the thesis of a work behind a distortion. a lot of the confusion i see in those comments is just struggling to figure out what the authorial intent is because it’s A) not “common knowledge” and B) deeply obfuscated by the Cunk format.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              Hm. Drag thought the thesis was presented clearly in the last line. “Lemmy users are upset because they hate trans people”. Cunk starts off by agreeing with the dominant Lemmy view that the site is full of trolls, and then flips the script by telling the truth. Cunk starts off on the reader’s level, sharing their false assumptions, and then unexpectedly tells a truth the reader doesn’t know. That’s how drag understands effective communication to work, start from the reader’s knowledge and then tell them something they don’t know. Perhaps there are nuances to the format of communication that drag doesn’t understand.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                yeah oof i think the problem is too many layers. try starting with a meme format that just says directly what you mean to say (dont make tme tap the sign comes to mind), and adding irony and layers of humor should really only come when the audience is familiar with all sides of the material more

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  So you’re saying drag should make dozens of repetitive shitposts reiterating the same point until the 196 audience is familiar enough with the issue to understand more complex humour on the topic. Okey dokey, sounds like fun!

                  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    r u trolling me rn 😭 no that’s not what i said. dozens? chill pls