I refuse to watch cable news, don’t have regular tv, and not a fan of visual media for news anyways. I would love something like a Lemmy/reddit mega thread where I can refresh and get up to the minute updates, but from professional news/journalists. But without the faux drama reality tv stuff that the cable news networks always do. I also love podcasts so if there’s a listening medium that isn’t overly dramatic that works too. Any suggestions?

  • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Your state likely has a web page designated for election results, so you could get information straight from the source for everything you voted for in your state and see which way your state goes for the presidential election. Your county website may also have a page to show whether any propositions were accepted or rejected.

    I’m not sure about a better source to see where all 50 states’ results are reported. Maybe Balllotpedia has something that updates. I’m not sure the federal government would have something because the official results won’t happen until January 6 when a joint session of Congress reads and counts the votes from the Electoral College (who doesn’t vote until December 17).

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Some More News will do a livestream of the results. They are usually on point with their analysis and sources.

    • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It took about a week for Biden to be declared the winner last time IIRC.

      What I’m really dreading is another Bush v. Gore, which would almost certainly result the same as it did the first time around.

      • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Nederlands
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The fact that the Electoral College was determined to be more important than the people’s votes was shameful.

        Al Gore and Hillary should have won.

          • Ham Strokers Ejacula@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            That depends entirely how this all plays out. Its too soon to say. If his only defense is “just look at them” then I don’t think the SC would go for it, especially if Harris wins decisively or even in a landslide (highly improbable).

            Do the dems win the senate and house? Are immediate impeachments on the table?

            If there’s any ambiguity though (think hanging chads), then yeah Trump 100%. I just think the SCOTUS is filled with cowards who want a veneer of a lie to hide under.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              You just have so much more faith in the Integrity of the Supreme Court than I do. I have no faith whatsoever. I’ve been following their movements the last few years way too closely to have any respect at all for their discretion or good judgment. They’ve shown time and time again that they have no sense of reality no sense of consistency and no sense of justice. Evidence is made up and ignored at will. Precedent is enforced or ignored by their whims. The narrative history of our entire nation is up to how Samuel Alito feels on that particular day. There’s no doubt in my mind that if in any way whatsoever the Supreme Court gets a hold of this thing they will find in favor of Trump no matter the circumstances or evidence.

    • Meltrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Jane Street Capital lost like $100m 8 years ago assuming this would happen and it didn’t.

    • mub@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Depending on which bit of the market you look at I suspect it could also go up.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Unless I take the extreme measure of touching grass, social media will keep me apprised unbidden.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    all of our media is controlled by capitalists so i plan on going with organizations that have had a reliable history within the last decade or so; like democracynow or npr.

    • can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Is it bad that I get most of my non-local news from foreign sources? I do look at the AP and NPR but I usually go to the BBC or Reuters first and I almost always check the CSM for international stories I want more information on.

      • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Nederlands
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Reuters, BBC are fine, AP as well. Al Jazeera is good too. Always be aware of the media biases, nevertheless. Look how they frame and write.

        Do they say:

        [ethnic thing] arrested and stopped by Police…
        or do they say:
        Police murders person…

        and;
        Trump victim of woke witchhunt / Harris loyal to Israel
        or:
        “The elections have started.”

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The BBC and Reuters have both gone way, way downhill in recent years, but the concept is reasonably valid. AP and NPR are still good. Aljazeera is actually pretty decent for US news, though I’m not sure if that’s true for US news related to the middle east.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I think the US news sites are going to post their live updates to their websites too, that is at least how it was the last few presidential elections (I think I mostly used CNN). That is the same data they use for their news coverage, so you could use that; but watching live television will give you a clue when important updates have happened on them.

    Of course you could just follow election-related hashtags on Mastodon to get a wide variety of people shouting all kinds of things about the election.

  • CelloMike@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Most of the major newspapers (this is from a UK perspective but I’d imagine they’re accessible in other places) have a live news page for big developing news stories - the BBC site is probably a good unbiased-ish one

  • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Hasan Poker ain’t for everyone but he’s super knowledgeable and provides great context for ongoing issues. I mainly watch on YouTube so the clips are edited down and even more context (charts, sources, etc) are added.

  • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Maybe good ol newspapers or eventually check if the federal government has an official result page

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The federal government doesn’t run the elections so you’d have to check the 51 Secretary of State (or equivalent) sites to actually get live results.