Flying Squid@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agoTampa Bay hasn’t been hit directly by a major hurricane since 1921. Milton may be the oneapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1187arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1181arrow-down1external-linkTampa Bay hasn’t been hit directly by a major hurricane since 1921. Milton may be the oneapnews.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agomessage-square26fedilinkfile-text
Edit: Just found this graphic. Tampa could very well be fucked on a Katrina level without any levees breaking.
minus-squareandrewta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·3 months agoLove how you are getting down voted for stating fact
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down2·3 months agoI’m not even sure what I said that was so objectionable, but whatever. It’s fake internet points.
minus-squarehomoludens@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-23 months agoIt’s probably because of the last sentence. Which technically is a fact (because they obviously think that), but 5m is something at least cities in northern Germany are usually prepared for.
minus-squareandrewta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-23 months ago5 ft ABOVE the average tsunami is something most cities are prepared for?
minus-squarehomoludens@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months ago the storm surge could be up to 15 feet
minus-squareandrewta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoSorry about the error of switching from ft to m. But still 5 ft above an average tsunami is a large increase. I’d be surprise if most coastal cities could handle that
minus-squarenjm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoNobody said 5 m above anything, the original comment was 5 ft above the average tsunami. So 15 ft total which isn’t quite 5 m but it’s close ish.
minus-squareandrewta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoSorry for the typo. Will correct it.
Love how you are getting down voted for stating fact
I’m not even sure what I said that was so objectionable, but whatever. It’s fake internet points.
It’s probably because of the last sentence. Which technically is a fact (because they obviously think that), but 5m is something at least cities in northern Germany are usually prepared for.
5 ft ABOVE the average tsunami is something most cities are prepared for?
Sorry about the error of switching from ft to m.
But still 5 ft above an average tsunami is a large increase. I’d be surprise if most coastal cities could handle that
Nobody said 5 m above anything, the original comment was 5 ft above the average tsunami. So 15 ft total which isn’t quite 5 m but it’s close ish.
Sorry for the typo. Will correct it.