The resolution also calls on member states not to sell arms or military equipment to Israel that would be used in Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem.

The United Nations General Assembly voted 124-14 on Wednesday to strip Israel of the right to self-defense in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

The test of the resolution was based on the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion in July that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory was illegal.

The resolution also calls on member states not to sell arms or military equipment to Israel that would be used in Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem.

Among the 43 countries that abstained were Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Some 12 of the 27 European Union countries abstained, including Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Sweden.

  • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    542·
    2 months ago

    Exactly. Every time the UN does something, people say “they can’t enforce it”.

    Well, that’s the whole point of the UN. To resolve things without using force.

    It’s a good design, designed by people who learned from the horrors of WW2.

    It’s sad to see how many people nowadays forget those lessons and are itching for global war.

    • antmzo220@lemmy.mlEnglish
      112·
      2 months ago

      Why does it really matter that issues can be “discussed” if the issue being discussed is as atrocious as what Israel is doing to Palestine.

      Israel and the US know that what they’re doing is wrong. Them and their crony countries aren’t going to change course because of this.

      It doesn’t exactly prevent WW2 if they tell Hitler to stop and he doesn’t listen…unless of course they choose to let him continue his goals unimpeded rather than go to war, citing their documented disagreement as sufficient counter action…

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        34·
        2 months ago

        Because there is value in a large group speaking with a unified voice to say “this is wrong, and you need to know that the rest of us think it’s wrong. Your behavior will affect the relationship you have with us all going forward”. Direct intervention isn’t the only form of consequence.

        Is it the best solution to the problem? No. Is it still worth doing? Yes.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      62·
      2 months ago

      I, personally, am itching for progress. In my lifetime. What history has proven is that progress is never achieved without bloodshed.

      Though there is one very easy step the US at least can take that isn’t bloodshed: STOP SELLING WEAPONS TO ISRAEL.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      42·
      2 months ago

      You got it ass-backwards. The point of the UN as opposed to LoN was that it can enforce shit. And do that very heavily. The only problem was that the chosen group of wise and powerful to decide this now includes Russia as the heir of the USSR (why the hell) and China (which is not the China that got the place initially) and UK (which is collecting cannibals to suck off all over the globe) and USA (which just arbitrarily invaded Iraq and didn’t even apologize) and France (seems kinda normal, but CFA etc were not nice) and the situation really sucks.

      • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
        21·
        2 months ago

        Russia and the US are involved because the other half of the UNs purpose is to keep them both from nuking shit.