• addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah; as a native and fairly well-educated speaker, I’m fucked if I can form the past participles of some of our verbs

    If I swim across a river, is it now the swimmed river? Swum river? Swam river?

    If I sneak into a room, have I sneaked? Snuck? Both sound wrong.

    Didn’t find anything ambiguous about ‘costed’, it works for me.

    • Censored@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you swim across a river, it is now a river you’ve swum. If you sneak into a room, you have snuck in.

      Those are correct but they look and sound wrong.

    • palordrolap@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Would some variant of “snauk(t)” or “snaught” work for you? Your brain might be expecting ablaut in the style of “teach” / “taught” or “catch” / “caught” rather than that of “sing” / “sung”.

      How do you feel about “(p)reached”? “Snaked”?

      A fun fact about “caught” is that it’s a relative neologism. It uh, caught on after people decided they didn’t like “catched” for whatever reason. (I guess it has something to do with tangibility / concreteness. Most other -atch words are used for objects.)