At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. military launched a secret campaign to counter what it perceived as China’s growing influence in the Philippines, a nation hit especially hard by the deadly virus.

The clandestine operation has not been previously reported. It aimed to sow doubt about the safety and efficacy of vaccines and other life-saving aid that was being supplied by China, a Reuters investigation found. Through phony internet accounts meant to impersonate Filipinos, the military’s propaganda efforts morphed into an anti-vax campaign. Social media posts decried the quality of face masks, test kits and the first vaccine that would become available in the Philippines – China’s Sinovac inoculation.

Reuters identified at least 300 accounts on X, formerly Twitter, that matched descriptions shared by former U.S. military officials familiar with the Philippines operation. Almost all were created in the summer of 2020 and centered on the slogan #Chinaangvirus – Tagalog for China is the virus.

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    How the fuck does anyone think its a good idea to keep people from vaccinating? They realise the virus just keeps spreading globally if any one country keeps having it in circulation? Just bizarre. Just like Russia.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It started while Trump was trying to act like the pandemic was a hoax. So I’m not that surprised. Article also says Biden shut it down in spring of 2021 which wasn’t long after he was sworn in.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Except the article also notes that Twitter didn’t remove the accounts and their posts until Reuters told them about it, presumably because the Department of Defense never told Twitter or anyone else about this program.

        Biden should have informed the public about this bad behavior, publicly condemned it, and publicly held the people behind it accountable. It shouldn’t have taken investigative journalists digging quotes out of nameless sources to bring this to light if the administration were serious about preventing the spread of misinformation and not just trying to sweep an obviously dumb idea under the rug before it could blow up in their faces.

        e; also, the article concludes

        The Pentagon’s audit concluded that the military’s primary contractor handling the campaign, General Dynamics IT, had employed sloppy tradecraft, taking inadequate steps to hide the origin of the fake accounts, said a person with direct knowledge of the review. The review also found that military leaders didn’t maintain enough control over its psyop contractors, the person said.

        A spokesperson for General Dynamics IT declined to comment.

        Nevertheless, the Pentagon’s clandestine propaganda efforts are set to continue. In an unclassified strategy document last year, top Pentagon generals wrote that the U.S. military could undermine adversaries such as China and Russia using “disinformation spread across social media, false narratives disguised as news, and similar subversive activities [to] weaken societal trust by undermining the foundations of government.”

        And in February, the contractor that worked on the anti-vax campaign – General Dynamics IT – won a $493 million contract. Its mission: to continue providing clandestine influence services for the military.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe they did. The White House has ways of getting information out without significantly adding additional attention.

          The anonymous sources here were way more talkative than military types tend to be.

          Seems to me like an example of another thing getting repaired after Trump broke it.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Attention should have been drawn to this. Beyond the whole “America should practice what it preaches to every other country” thing, how is someone who was exposed to our disinformation and believed it going to find out it was false if we just try to memory-hole the whole thing?

            They were only talkative after the Reuters reporters showed up with evidence of their bad behavior, so it’s not like we’re dealing with whistleblowers here. Fair point that military types tend to say a lot of bullshit and don’t like to answer questions, though, which is why what really ought to happen here is a public Congressional hearing with subpoenas that force them to answer questions with their names attached to their statements. We need to know who the people who approved and implemented this were so we can make sure their careers with our military are over (or that they’re never contracted for work by our military ever again).

            Seems to me like another example of shithead moderate Dems covering up for psychopathic Republicans and normalizing their shittiest policies by coming up with a bit more paperwork instead of tearing them out root and branch like most Dem voters would want them to (see also; Biden continuing Trump’s attacks on asylum and migration, Obama continuing Bush’s drone war, Clinton continuing Reagan and Bush’s attacks on welfare programs, etc.).

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I don’t care if they are considered our enemies; that’s fucked up. Our government’s grievances are of their government. Not the people. Not the culture. Not the land itself. Doing shit that harms the average person is incredibly vile.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s fucked up when we do it, it’s fucked up when Russia does it, it’s fucked up when China does it. This is terrible.

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So basically the people claiming that vaccines are dangerous and part of a secret government scheme to control us were actually the victims of a secret government scheme to convince us that vaccines are dangerous.

  • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    1. The antivaxxers were complaining a conspiracy when this whole time they were the conspiracy.
    2. This whole time antivax kept getting blamed on Russian troll farms, when the troll farms were Western all along. Golden.
    • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is why the US lacks credibility.

      When I hear about Tienanmen Square and all the protestors killed, I want to believe the US… and not believe China… and yet, I can’t be sure that anything coming from the US isn’t just made up garbage. It’s probably not… but I can’t really know!

      It’s a horrible policy decision too allow things like this and creates major distrust of all US government narratives, when almost all of them could be true.

      • salamandermander@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah all the photos and film of Tiananmen Square are surely just propaganda right? That event was just made up by the US and definitely wasn’t witnessed by and broadcasted by several different countries’ news services.

        The US has done some bad shit, and still does. But do not let that blind you to the crimes of other countries. There’s a reason why the Chinese government censors mentions of June 1989 and the mass deaths due to famine during the great leap forward.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yeah all the photos and film of Tiananmen Square are surely just propaganda right?

          The crazy thing about Tianamen was that the Tank Driver stopped and tried to move around the protester.

          It was a remarkable moment of humanity between two people who clearly did not want to be in conflict with one another.

          I can’t imagine a modem day officer treating any protesters the same way.

          There’s a reason why the Chinese government censors mentions of June 1989 and the mass deaths due to famine during the great leap forward.

          That’s completely untrue.

          Here is an exhaustive response from a Chinese national. Not only is it not illegal, its documented in Baidu, China’s most popular social media site.

          The claim that Chinese schools and leaders simply don’t talk about the First Five Year Plan is entirely fictitious. On par with claiming Americans don’t teach their kids about the Founding Fathers owning slaves.

          It’s pure Western propaganda.

            • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Just remember that you can’t trust every anonymously sourced photo on the internet. Don’t forget to try to evaluate the genuineness of what you’re seeing.

              For example, ask yourself if you can actual see identifiable features of Tiananmen Square in the background of these photos. (You would expect to be able to, right?)

              Especially with an emotive topic like this. These photos inspire strong visceral reactions, and sometimes they’re counting on that. They want you to be so overwhelmed with disgust that you don’t stop to realize that some of the photos are obviously fake or mislabelled.

              Like the ones that show piles of meat claiming to be the bodies of students run over by tanks. A moment’s thought will make it obvious that they are fake, because people’s clothes do not disappear when they are run over by tanks. But they want you to be so overwhelmed by disgust and anger that you don’t think about it.

              Sometimes they rely on sheer quantity, but don’t mistake quantity for quality.

              Anyway, I’m not going to push a side in this post. I trust that you can think for yourself.

              • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I mean like, whether the guy who looks like paint on the road is really “squished by a tank” or not, the whole “Tiananmen didn’t happen” defense sits from anywhere between “300 people, mostly soldiers died” to “nothing happened at all”. I’m noticing you didn’t explicitly say what happened, only what didn’t, so likewise I think you’ve shown you actually know what went down that day.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I’m noticing you didn’t explicitly say what happened

                  Consider the Kent State shooting. Imagine if we had a slew of Chinese language publications with interviews from dubiously sourced individuals asserting that hundreds of students were gunned down. Imagine a slew of articles every May 4th, asserting that American schools aren’t teaching about the Kent State Massacre. Then a slew of Op-Eds about how Americans were covering up the thousands of dead students by only releasing four names.

                  Now, try to have a coherent conversation about Kent State. What actually happened?

                • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I’m noticing you didn’t explicitly say what happened, only what didn’t

                  I didn’t say either of those things.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I can’t be sure that anything coming from the US isn’t just made up garbage

        I mean, ACAB is a safe bet in any country.

        The narrative around Tianamen is that it is the consequence of a totalitarian Communist economic policy, and that our liberal free markets mean it can’t ever happen here.

        The reality is that it was blowback from Chinese economic liberalization. This response is exactly the same as what you’ll find aimed at unionization drives around a sweatshop in the Philippines or a student protest on the Columbia college campus. Liberalism will not keep you safe from a row of tanks driving through your neighborhood or a police officer black bagging you for protesting on camera.

        Tianamen was a warning to the world of what was to come. But US media transformed it into a reason to be afraid of Chinese people.

  • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    As an American, I am ashamed that my country’s government does acts of pure evil like this. I’m sorry rest of the world, I wish my voice was more than but a whisper while on a St Patrick’s Day bar crawl in Boston.

    In my honest opinion whoever proposed this, approved this, and ultimately executed this should be persecuted for something akin to shouting fire leading to a stampede and deaths.

    Actions like this are exactly why we probably shouldn’t have a completely opaque society.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      General Jonathan Braga was promoted to Lieutenant General in August 2021, months after the new Biden administration was informed about and canceled the program.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        He followed orders and ran an effective disinformation campaign.

        Think of the Pentagon as a bureaucracy that just does what they’re told. If the President says they should invade a country X, they draw up the plans, figure out the logistics, and invade country X. If the President says invade country Y, same thing, just with country Y instead of country X. They follow orders, it’s kinda a big thing in the military.

        Trump ordered a disinformation campaign in the Philippines, so this guy ran an effective disinformation campaign in the Philippines. If the President wanted to run a disinformation campaign in Russia this would be a guy they’d want to do it.

        Follows orders and is good at his job, that’s the criteria needed for a promotion.

        The blame lies on Trump for giving the order.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Following orders is no excuse and the campaign should be is and is a crime of meaningful scope and scale.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well sorry to break it to you, there’s no international law making disinformation campaigns illegal. It was a bad order to be sure, but not an illegal order.

            Soldiers are responsible when following an illegal order. When it’s a bad order, then it’s the person giving the order that’s responsible.

            It’s just how military works. They have to follow the law, but not your personal morality. I mean what’s the morality around killing a person because they’re wearing a different uniform? Do you think that’s fine while a disinformation campaigns are crossing the line?

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              You just legitimized Russian, Iranian and Chinese disinformation campaigns against America. Good job, I guess.

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                It is what it is. War is a much more horrible thing than a disinformation campaign. So let’s just make war illegal, problem solved!

                Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way.

                Whether Russian, Iranian and Chinese disinformation campaigns against America are legitimate or not isn’t all that relevant. They’re happening and will continue to happen regardless of how legitimate anyone considers them to be.

                Eventually there may be treaties countries will agree to stop doing disinformation campaigns. But Russia, China, and Iran aren’t going to sign on to these agreements if they’re the only ones with the capability to conduct disinformation campaigns. Why would they give up their capabilities to disrupt their adversaries if their adversaries didn’t have the capability to disrupt their countries with disinformation? Gotta have Mutually Assured Disinformation before you can get everyone to agree to stop these activities.

                Just how global politics works.

            • hglman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Whats funny is the poster here was very likely part of said disinformation campaign. This is an attempt to distract from the moral wrong excuted here with the cover of legality. No laws existed that made the Holocaust illegal yet the post laws and trails are valid and necessary. The acts here should be seen as a form of biological warfare, a crime against humanity with all the reprehensible disgust and reasonable punishment due to those who did not stand up and walk away.

              Following orders is not just how it works and the criminality of following illegal orders has been established many times.

              This is a crime, regardless of the laws today, regardless of my feelings, it is never acceptable to attempt to infect others with a deadly biological agent directly or indirectly.

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Is it a crime to kill a person simply because they’re wearing a different uniform from you?

                That’s what the military does, right? They kill people for wearing a different uniform. What’s the morality around that? Is it more or less moral to lie to someone than it is to kill them?

                We can debate the morality of the existence of militaries all we want. But people in power in places like Russia aren’t having that debate. They will use their capabilities to expand their power in absence of a force to oppose them. We need military capabilities and that we means we need to have people willing to kill people for wearing a different uniform. God forbid they might lie to people sometimes, right? Killing people we’re fine with, but disinformation crosses the line!

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That excuse didn’t work for the Germans and regular soldiers in WW2. Why would you think it should work for America now?

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Are you claiming that a disinformation campaign is a war crime and therefore an illegal order?

            That’s kinda a stretch don’t you think?

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I’m 100% willing to claim that. The expected end result of this is fewer civilians taking the Chinese vaccine (with likely spillover for other vaccine efforts) and thus more disease deaths. That’s a pretty solid justification for war crimes.

              Just like “shooting a gun” isn’t a war crime. It’s not the act that’s a crime, it’s the expected results and the victims.

  • schizoidman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal

    Henry Kissinger