schizoidman@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前Solar modules deployed in France in 1992 still provide 75.9% of original output powerwww.pv-magazine.comexternal-linkmessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down13 cross-posted to: energy@slrpnk.nettechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1external-linkSolar modules deployed in France in 1992 still provide 75.9% of original output powerwww.pv-magazine.comschizoidman@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前message-square168fedilink cross-posted to: energy@slrpnk.nettechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·3 个月前 basically exactly the same situation as we’re in now You think if we take away 50 years of burning fossil fuels we’d be in “the same situation as we’re in now”?? Wtf are you smoking?
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·3 个月前 As if it’s fucking green activists blocking nuclear and not the fossil fuel lobby It literally is, though I suspect the greens are the useful stooges of the fossil fuel propaganda.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 个月前So I quoted this sentence: As if it’s fucking green activists blocking nuclear and not the fossil fuel lobby And then you started talking a bunch of blah blah about renewables, which I will note is NOT in that sentence. And you did not mention nuclear, which I will note is the entire SUBJECT of that sentence.
You think if we take away 50 years of burning fossil fuels we’d be in “the same situation as we’re in now”?? Wtf are you smoking?
deleted by creator
It literally is, though I suspect the greens are the useful stooges of the fossil fuel propaganda.
deleted by creator
So I quoted this sentence:
And then you started talking a bunch of blah blah about renewables, which I will note is NOT in that sentence.
And you did not mention nuclear, which I will note is the entire SUBJECT of that sentence.