• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You’re not the brightest spoon in the drawer are you?

    “Naked” and “child” are two concepts it can learn and combine without needing to be taught “naked child”.
    It does not need to see an example of every type of thing it can generate.
    It can combine pornographic concepts learned in isolation to disparate unrelated concepts.

    It does not need to have been trained on child porn to generate child porn.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I haven’t and won’t attempt any testing on this, for obvious reasons. But at the same time, if any AI system out there can manage to generate images of pre-puberty private parts, then the training data must have included inappropriate material to be able to distinguish the differences.